Another howler from FesterWorld. There is nothing easy about the research, exploration and analysis that has gone into modern evolutionary theory.
In contrast to Creationism (GodDIdIt) or ID (some unknown...nudge nudge wink wink... creator did it). ID doesn't even have a shred of positive supporting evidence, and you dare to call evolution 'easy science'. Your gall is only matched by your sketchy understanding of modern science.
I do not particularly see "evolutiondidit" as a difficult assumption to support through the interpretation of physical evidence. Again, science the easy way says, "Since these biological entities look alike, they must be related in history." Evolutionism is emprically vapid. I hesitate to call it science, unless one also wishes to call astrology science. Its modern founder was a natural philosopher. Too bad some people are so lazy minded as to elevate his ideas to the status of empirical science and then expect such ideas to have sole reign in the public school classroom by law.