To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
2 posted on
03/21/2006 5:25:50 PM PST by
PatrickHenry
(Yo momma's so fat she's got a Schwarzschild radius.)
To: PatrickHenry
including but not limited to "intelligent design and information effectively challenging the theory of evolution." Both ID and effective challenges? What would the effective challenges be?
3 posted on
03/21/2006 5:27:53 PM PST by
RightWhale
(pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
To: PatrickHenry
Dover II ===> Placemarker <===
4 posted on
03/21/2006 5:29:20 PM PST by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
To: PatrickHenry
10 posted on
03/21/2006 5:37:56 PM PST by
M203M4
To: PatrickHenry
"... to ensure that all aspects of the theories, along with any supportive data, are fully examined through such course of study."
This should be interesting. On the one hand we have all Creation Science Scientific Publications (a big fat 0). On the other hand we have two floors of a SUNY anything Library. I'd like to see this.
To: The Ghost of FReepers Past; ohioWfan; Tribune7; Tolkien; GrandEagle; Right in Wisconsin; Dataman; ..
The main difference is that the bill now would require pupils to receive instruction in "all aspects of the controversy surrounding evolution and the origins of man," including but not limited to "intelligent design and information effectively challenging the theory of evolution."
Revelation 4:11
Constantly searching for objectivity in the evolution debate...
See my profile for info
21 posted on
03/21/2006 5:50:47 PM PST by
wallcrawlr
(http://www.bionicear.com)
To: PatrickHenry
Gentle reminder: Now hear this: No personal attacks (title of thread posted 15 March 2006 by Jim Robinson).
Thanks for posting that. Mindless Bible-belters such as myself appreciate your call to civility.
24 posted on
03/21/2006 5:58:29 PM PST by
Das Outsider
(The Christian form of relativism is by far the most dangerous one.)
To: PatrickHenry
Can we personally attack ourselves? I mean I'm a triple sided idiot with a clear path to doom and destruction, an idiot, a royal creep and a f(*^&^%#^*%$&#(&. Surely the mods won't find that too awful.
To: PatrickHenry
Paging Gilbert Ryle. Please make an appearance and tell these folks they are making a category mistake (like comparing oranges and fruit, for those not up on their philosophy).
To: PatrickHenry
If you have to pass a law to force an idea into science class, that may be a hint that it's not a very solid scientific idea.
To: PatrickHenry
I want Odin teached in the schools, if we are going to be ignorant, we should have a full world view ignorance.
55 posted on
03/21/2006 6:33:11 PM PST by
Central Scrutiniser
(Stunned, he asked: "What do you call your act?" "The Aristocrats!")
To: PatrickHenry
Darwinists can't stop the tide of truth even in Left Wing New York.
220 posted on
03/21/2006 11:12:47 PM PST by
balch3
To: PatrickHenry
In NY???? Ha!
233 posted on
03/22/2006 4:00:36 AM PST by
Vaquero
(time again for the Crusades.)
To: PatrickHenry
Most public school children are being denied an education to prepare them for living in this world.....while the major focus of concern is the teaching of creationism or evolution.
Too pathetic.
243 posted on
03/22/2006 4:51:48 AM PST by
pop-gun
(A dumbed down population is more dangerous to our country than terrorism.)
To: PatrickHenry
Why, why,why????
Does the Republican party really need to be even less popular than it is now?
To: PatrickHenry
The first priority should be to get rid of all public schools from K-12 through state universitites. Then private schools can teach whatever education consumers are willing to pay for.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson