Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Second-hand smoke kills 50,000 Americans each year, the group said.

Liars liars pants on fire!!!

1 posted on 03/21/2006 4:11:58 AM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: The Foolkiller; Just another Joe; Madame Dufarge; Cantiloper; metesky; Judith Anne; lockjaw02; ...

2 posted on 03/21/2006 4:12:43 AM PST by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion

There needs to be a resturant chain for smokers ONLY!If non-smokers want to eat there,then they should be forced outside.After all,they claim they want fresh air so they should go where there is fresh air.Smokers have much better personalities and are far more tolerant than those non-smoking control freaks.


3 posted on 03/21/2006 4:57:07 AM PST by INSENSITIVE GUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
Good title song for the pantywaists who want to take a little afterwork relaxation away from these oil worker roughnecks.
4 posted on 03/21/2006 5:04:58 AM PST by Vaquero (time again for the Crusades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion

I've been to Beaumont, when we deployed somewhere or other back in the 90's. Some food catering service was retained to provide take-out for us hungry GI pilots and mechanics. Mont Cler? Hm... chicken fried steak, and the gravy was pure ambrosia.


5 posted on 03/21/2006 5:20:39 AM PST by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion

I grew up in Beaumont, and delivered that paper at 4:30 AM at age 13, saving $2K for a crappy little Mustang II. I couldn't wait to get away from their and Forest Park High (West Brook now?). Not all that bad a place looking back though.


8 posted on 03/21/2006 5:33:21 AM PST by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion

I'm not a smoker but I am getting angry at smoking bans. They're turning America into a big mental institution's cafeteria.

Property & socializing circles belong to whoever makes the rule of these, and in this sense I see a sort of property takeover & a social holocaust waged on smokers by city councils accross the nation.

All these are Pharisean rules which can derail easily in any other inane cases of behaviors deemed "unsafe". I wonder how many of those laundering hypocrites in city counsils are just too fat or too old to do their jobs safely without it affecting us. There should be a rule against that (sarcasm)

The other thing is that owners should not have to be licensed this way as nurses. Taking the responsibility of smoking & putting it on the owner's shoulder smacks of irresponsability & thus racism.


13 posted on 03/21/2006 6:02:13 AM PST by JudgemAll (Condemn me, make me naked and kill me, or be silent for ever on my gun ownership and law enforcement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion; All
It passed.
Beaumont Bans Smoking in Public Places
Tuesday, April 25, 2006

The votes are in and smoking is out. On Tuesday, the Beaumont City Council voted to ban smoking in public places.
The votes of four council members tipped the decision in favor of the total ban. Mayor Guy Goodson and Mayor Pro Tem Audwin Samuel lost their bids for a partial-ban. The total ban means no smoking in public places such as restaurants, bars and workplaces. Also, one cannot smoke within 25 feet of the main public entrance to any venue in which the ban applies.
The ban does not focus solely on bars since the ordinance applies to all public work-places.
Christyn Killian works as a hairstylist at Regis Salons in Parkdale Mall five days a week, and will take about the same number of smoke breaks a day.
When the non-smoking ordinance takes effect, Killian will have to walk further than she normally does for a smoke, about 25 feet further from the door. But she says that is okay. “It’s second-hand smoke, and people who don`t smoke, they don`t appreciate it,” said Killian, “and I understand that.”
But not everyone is so understanding of the ordinance that some believe would remove the relaxation out of places designed to relax, especially some bar-goers.
“It’s a choice,” said Tonjia Chandler of Beaumont, “you have a choice whether to come in here, you know people are gonna smoke and what have you, so that`s your choice.”
The West Bar and Grill said that about 85% of their clientele are smokers, and it worries that some of them may stay away, at least temporarily, when smoking in public places becomes illegal
Owner of The West, Allen Peltier, said that he has been researching the effect of bars in cities that already have similar ordinances. “The way it sounds is that [business] takes a little dive for a while, and people [eventually] come back,” he said. “They`re gonna adapt.”
But if patrons do not adapt, The West said that it is looking into the possibility of becoming a private organization. Until that decision is made, however, they must be ready for the day that indoor smoking moves out-doors.
The so-called total ban comes with several exceptions--private residences, for example, are exempt.
It has been recommended by the city manager that August 1st should be the first day that the ordinance takes effect.

private residences eh?

I guess I should feel grateful that I can smoke in my own home ...

32 posted on 04/27/2006 2:28:02 AM PDT by dread78645 (Evolution. A dying theory since 1859.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson