Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/20/2006 6:13:34 PM PST by AZRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: AZRepublican

What are we to make of this?


2 posted on 03/20/2006 6:16:36 PM PST by Galtoid ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZRepublican

Unnamed current and former sorces- but of course. Are there any other kind?


3 posted on 03/20/2006 6:16:44 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZRepublican

If Sabri were an American, you can damn well bet NBC would give up his location.


4 posted on 03/20/2006 6:18:04 PM PST by Ron in Acreage (Liberal Democrats-Party before country, surrender before victory, generous with other peoples money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZRepublican

Sounds to me like the Big Media is bracing for the upcoming battle between what is factual and what is not (read: Right and Left, respectively), by affirming the barely-able-to-sustain lies that have been spouted all over the place.


6 posted on 03/20/2006 6:19:37 PM PST by sonofjoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZRepublican
Both the CIA and Sabri said Saddam had stockpiled chemical weapons, but both were wrong, NBC said.

And they know this how??

7 posted on 03/20/2006 6:19:39 PM PST by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZRepublican

"Sabri provided details of Saddam's weapons of mass destruction that turned out to be more accurate than CIA estimates."


"Sabri indicated that Saddam had no significant weapons program and that while the deposed Iraqi leader desperately wanted a nuclear bomb it would have taken more time for him to build one than the CIA's several-months-to-a-year estimate, NBC reported."

"Both the CIA and Sabri said Saddam had stockpiled chemical weapons, but both were wrong, NBC said."

"Sabri declined to be interviewed or to comment as did the CIA, NBC said, adding that the agency also would not say why it did not listen to Sabri's warnings."

Uh, the warnings about him stockpiling chemical weapons or the warnings that Saddam desperately wanted a nuclear bomb?


8 posted on 03/20/2006 6:22:04 PM PST by james500
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZRepublican
Assuming that this story is actually true, whoever felt it important to leak this just put this guy's life in a hell of a lot of danger.

I hope for his sake that he's well hidden and highly protected.

15 posted on 03/20/2006 6:33:56 PM PST by jpl ("We don't negotiate with terrorists, we put them out of business." - Scott McClellan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZRepublican
NBC wants everyone to think that this confirms there was no WMD and the CIA knew it but this actually confirms the opposite. He says there was no "significant" program but there was a program none the less. Saddam was years from acquiring a weapon but that pretty much verifies he had the desire. He then claimed there was "stockpiles" of weapons but turned out to be wrong. I think this could be considered high level verification so who cares if our intelligence was wrong.
18 posted on 03/20/2006 6:36:39 PM PST by Wasanother (Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZRepublican

http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/
http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents-docex/Iraq/Audio-transcripts/DOCEX%20Saddam%20030306.pdf


26 posted on 03/20/2006 7:03:29 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZRepublican
...Sabri said Saddam had stockpiled chemical weapons, but [was] wrong, NBC said. .

If Sabri was so knowledgeable, why did Sabri get this wrong?????

28 posted on 03/20/2006 7:07:02 PM PST by syriacus (Would fewer Americans have died in Iraq if the French and Germans had helped depose Saddam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZRepublican
Can outlets like NBC sink any lower?

There is no sedition or treason anymore.

These people at NBC are the lowest scum of the Earth.

30 posted on 03/20/2006 7:17:35 PM PST by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZRepublican

WELL where is bagdad bob I am sure he is willing to tell all for those who want something to write...


32 posted on 03/20/2006 7:35:00 PM PST by Tigen (Live in peace or rest in peace!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZRepublican
I see the liberal spin has begun now that the captured Iraqi documents have been released.

And wouldn't you know... their great "source" has connections to the French.

33 posted on 03/20/2006 7:37:22 PM PST by Reactionary (The Moonbats Need an Enema)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZRepublican
Wait. Isn't it against liberal dogma to leak the name of an intelligence agent?

No? You mean it isn't so long as said "agent" supports the idiot party line?

34 posted on 03/20/2006 7:38:44 PM PST by Reactionary (The Moonbats Need an Enema)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZRepublican

Why is NBC putting our intelligence assets at risk by identifying them. Loose Lips sink ships.

Even after the fact, the man's life may be in danger from his former comrades.

Not to mention how other current intel assets and people we try to recruit in the future will take this revelation--e.g. The US will not or cannot keep its secrets, so my life may be on the line.


36 posted on 03/20/2006 7:53:59 PM PST by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZRepublican

Old tricks are the best tricks. Double agents are nothing new. This is counter intelligence effort to discedit the US and it allies. The old Iraqi regime was using him to divert attention and is probably still doing so. They are still putting up a fight so why not work the media angle.


37 posted on 03/20/2006 7:54:10 PM PST by Teutates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZRepublican

bump


44 posted on 03/20/2006 8:30:20 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZRepublican

After 9-11, we declared war on three sponsors of global terrorism. After securing Afghanistan and bringing Pakistan on board, we took out the only real standing army in the area that might come to Iran's aid when the campaign against it begins.
Israel should rename a Holy City after Bush.


46 posted on 03/20/2006 8:37:38 PM PST by TET1968
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZRepublican
So let me get this straight the MSM believes that unknown sources, bribed officials are proof Bush knew and lied. The Administration, Iraqi Documents and named sources say that Saddam had WMD and they are all not credible sources. Humm.... Who should we trust?
52 posted on 03/21/2006 8:13:11 AM PST by reagandemo (The battle is near are you ready for the sacrifice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZRepublican

The agency had been hoping for a public relations coup, the network said.

There...it's fixed...

53 posted on 03/21/2006 1:32:46 PM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson