Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ten Commandments Movie Celebrates 50th Anniversary
Family News in Focus ^ | March 20, 2006 | Terry Phillips

Posted on 03/20/2006 2:21:24 PM PST by beaversmom

Movie is commemorated with a DVD edition.

Hollywood’s Past and the Bible’s History haunt us this week as Cecil B. DeMille’s classic renditions of The Ten Commandments are re-released in a collector’s DVD edition. This year is the 50th Anniversary of the second version, the one in which Charlton Heston leads the Exodus. Syndicated radio host and movie critic, Michael Medved says its “it’s amazing how well the movie has held up.” And with a chuckle fondly offers his own opinion.

“The Ten Commandments is one of the most endearing and important bad movies ever made. But the movie works.”

DeMille historian, Katherine Orrison, says it was a labor of love for the famous director.

“We’re talking about five years and we’re talking about the biggest budget movie ever made up until that time.”

And Orrison would not agree that DeMille turned those ancient events into a “bad” movie.

“DeMille took those ideas and those scenes and he embellished them so that they don’t look old and they don’t bore even in 2006.”

But then, Medved says the original “writer” is the best-selling, actuality-reporter for the millennia and a million Hebrews backed His account.

“The fact that there are so many people, who are alleged to have seen this public display of God’s role in history, I think is the strongest argument that something very, very remarkable happened all those 3,000 years ago in the Wilderness of Sinai.”

The Ten Commandments was the centerpiece in a decade of biblical epics that movie-goers loved and Hollywood has abandoned.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: charltonheston; demille; medved; tencommandments; thetencommandments; yulbrynner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: EveningStar; HairOfTheDog; beaversmom
It is campy and Charlton Heston is a rather Aryan looking Moses. :-) However, a four hour movie that isn't boring for a minute is an achievement in and of itself. DeMille's showmanship and storytelling savvy is sorely lacking these days. It's twice as long as Gladiator and goes by twice as fast. And you have to love Edward G. Robinson's 'Brooklyn-born Ancient Israelite' schtick.
21 posted on 03/20/2006 7:48:52 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Borges
a four hour movie that isn't boring for a minute is an achievement in and of itself

That is what has always amazed me about this film. I agree with you.

22 posted on 03/20/2006 7:53:32 PM PST by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Borges

I don't think it's campy! Some of the sets look like matte paintings, but I sortof expect that in a movie of that era. You're right, it's not ever boring, no matter how many times I've seen it.


23 posted on 03/20/2006 7:55:33 PM PST by HairOfTheDog (Hobbit Hole knives for soldiers! www.freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

Indeed, a whole movie could have been made of the manna and the water from the Rock. Thank you for your insights!


24 posted on 03/20/2006 10:19:03 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Borges
"Charlton Heston is a rather Aryan looking Moses."

Ever seen the silent version (also directed by DeMille)? Chuck is practically a caricature Semite compared to Theodore Roberts ;)

Nevertheless, I may actually prefer the earlier 10 C - 2 hours shorter and it has a modern-day story illustrating what happens to those who don't keep the Commandments.
25 posted on 03/20/2006 10:29:39 PM PST by decal (My name is "decal" and I approve this tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

I love this movie! When I was in grade school, we had a class trip to New Haven, CT to see it. I'm sure the tv remake will not be anywhere nearly as good.


26 posted on 03/21/2006 7:07:53 AM PST by tob2 (I may not be perfect but I'm always me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decal
Yeah the 1923 version was directed by DeMille as well. He was once asked if he was influenced by earlier film makers when he started making movies...he replied correctly that there were no earlier filmmakers.
27 posted on 03/21/2006 7:23:15 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson