Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Amelia
Since 1790, the census has asked age, sex, and race questions. Before 1870, they also wanted to know how many slaves were in the household.

That was because originally not everyone could vote, but districts were apportioned by population, with slaves counting as a portion of a person. That was a political compromise to keep the southern states from having the highest representation in the House. The other options were to count every slave (population would be heavier in the south) or count none of them (population would be heavier in the north). To balance they agreed on fractional representation for some.

45 posted on 03/18/2006 11:15:59 AM PST by Kay Ludlow (Free market, but cautious about what I support with my dollars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Kay Ludlow
That was because originally not everyone could vote, but districts were apportioned by population, with slaves counting as a portion of a person.

Right. My point was that the census takers have always "needed" to know more than just "how many people".

In 1790, white people were grouped by males of militia age, males younger than militia age, and females of any age. ;-)

47 posted on 03/18/2006 11:20:44 AM PST by Amelia (Education exists to overcome ignorance, not validate it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson