[Tabi Katz]

Support from about a quarter of Americans who describe themselves as evangelicals was a factor in President George W Bush's two election victories. The Republicans will need to keep them onboard if they are to retain control of Congress in November.

Those who are shilling forGiuliani or McCain as our next presidential candidate would be wise to remember this. I am not an evangelical, but I do share their political views and realize that Republicans cannot afford to amputate them from their "big tent."

[Dark Skies]

I'm shilling for Giuliani...not because he's a conservative, but because he's the closest thing to a Churchill around today.

If you recall, Churchill was voted out of office only three months after the end of WWII.

I might be wrong, but I think Giuliani is a "war president."

Oh...and remember, we are at war.

[CobaltBlue]

Well, I am NOT Evangelical, I am libertarian, and I DO support Guiliani and McCain, and I vote, too.

I've been voting Republican for decades but if the party decides to pander to Evangelicals they can kiss my vote goodbye.

[stands2reason]

The reason the Pubbies need the SocCons is BECAUSE they are so willing to sit it out.

You have to pay for the things you can't get for free.

[DougJ]

Those who are shilling for Giuliani or McCain as our next presidential candidate would be wise to remember this. Amen. Either one would be, essentially, Hillary-lite. Giuliani is, if anything, more of a puppet of the homosexual lobby than most Dumborats.

[Sir Francis Dashwood]

Those who are shilling for Giuliani or McCain as our next presidential candidate would be wise to remember this. I am not an evangelical, but I do share their political views...

Same here. I could not have expressed it any more exactly.

It makes no sense joining and building a political party if everybody is “bipartisan.”

‘Second guessing is not a strategy’ and capitulation is not a victory...