Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Officials Make Public Intoxication Arrests Inside Bars
nbc5i.com ^ | March 15, 2006

Posted on 03/17/2006 10:33:37 AM PST by billorites

IRVING, Texas -- The Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission has taken its fight against drunken driving to a new level. TABC agents, along with Irving police, targeted 36 bars and clubs Friday, arresting some allegedly intoxicated patrons before they departed the businesses.

The officers and agents also kept watch on bartenders who might have over-served patrons.

Agents arrested 30 people Friday night. Most of the suspects now face charges of public intoxication.

The agents and Irving police officers traveled from bar to bar and worked undercover, according to an NBC 5 report.

The report also said that some agents shared tables with suspected drunken patrons. Some patrons were subjected to field sobriety tests inside bars.

Agents and officers said the operation represented an effort to reduce drunken driving.

Sgt. Chris Hamilton, of the TABC, said some inebriated bar patrons "end up killing themselves or someone else" after departing the businesses.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1984; donut; donutwatch; freedomlost; jackbootedthugs; jbt; lawenforcement; leo; libertarians; nanny; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-205 next last
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Where are the anti-smoking zealots at now who said banning smoking won't lead to a slippery slope?

Trying to think up a rational rebuttal to your question.

Or they'll just dismiss it as not relevant.

81 posted on 03/17/2006 12:02:50 PM PST by AFreeBird (your mileage may vary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner
Whew! Sorry for the mix up. :)

I guess now all the beer companies can save money on the designated driver ads they run. People are now no longer allowed to get drunk enough to need one. And now, I fear that ugly people in college (men and women) will never get laid as beer goggles will be a thing of the past...
82 posted on 03/17/2006 12:03:37 PM PST by WV Mountain Mama (I am the anti-soccer mom. Feminists fear me for I am raising a traditional family with values.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner
Why should our freedoms be taken away because you have stupid and irresponsible friends?

I'll add you to the list even though you are no friend.

I never said I agreed with it, nor that I had friends who would have benefited. It was just an observation.

83 posted on 03/17/2006 12:04:11 PM PST by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: billorites

I have no love at all for our states Alcoholic Beverage Commission officers. Several of my friends had run ins with them in college.

Buraucrats with badges.


84 posted on 03/17/2006 12:08:35 PM PST by somniferum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stevenc131

That would depend on what game you are watching and on what network. One needs a blood alchohol content of at least .08 just to make sense of Dennis Miller doing MNF!


85 posted on 03/17/2006 12:13:41 PM PST by blackdog (Forever re-timing flap tuckers. Hell is maintaining what stupid engineers sold to even dumber execs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: billorites

Nazi's


86 posted on 03/17/2006 12:14:45 PM PST by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites; ImaTexan
Our former (and now quite wealthy) sheriff used to have his cops follow people from bars, pull them over and demand that everyone step out of the car. They would then arrest the passengers for public intoxication. The fate of the drivers varied -- charges of DUI would get them to the jail, even if they were the designated driver who hadn't drunk a thing.

The big money was in the passengers contributing to the sheriffs "anti-drug" fund to make the charges disappear.

87 posted on 03/17/2006 12:17:02 PM PST by bjcintennessee (Don't Sweat the Small Stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan; unixfox

Thats it exactly. They just keep pushing the envelope. I wish I could say the bottom line was that this was just a revenue measure, but that's not true. They want you to bendova and take it just because some inferiority-laden cops or fascist legislature says so.

"To Protect and SERVE" is long gone.

Now it's "To Regulate and Command"


88 posted on 03/17/2006 12:20:19 PM PST by djf (I'm not Islamophobic. But I am bombophobic! If that's the same, freakin deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Stevenc131
I wonder if the law relating to public intoxication actually has a blood alcohol level mentioned in it?

It does not. From the Texas Penal Code:

§ 49.02. PUBLIC INTOXICATION. (a) A person commits an offense if the person appears in a public place while intoxicated to the degree that the person may endanger the person or another.
This story was on the local news last night, including tape of the arrests. The people I saw and heard were able to walk and converse coherently, and did not appear to be a danger to anybody. The bartender, a young woman, was sobbing at being arrested for doing her job. I hate this kind of shakedown and intimidation.

Unfortunately, the law is vague enough that it appears to rely entirely on the subjective judgment of the arresting officer, so I am not sure what defense you could even offer, other than the word of other witnesses, if you could track them down.

89 posted on 03/17/2006 12:21:08 PM PST by PhatHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

The scariest collection of people in a bar you'll ever want to see is the corrections' officers' bar behind the Trenton State Prison.


90 posted on 03/17/2006 12:21:29 PM PST by jjmcgo (Patriarch of the Occident since March 1, 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: billorites

Y'all say what you want but if you own a bar and are well connected to the local fuzz you have no worries. More than once I have seen the cops take out local competition in favour of their "buddies" that owned bars in the same area.


91 posted on 03/17/2006 12:23:39 PM PST by eastforker (Under Cover FReeper going dark(too much 24))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf

"Protect and Serve" was printed on the side of LAPD cop cars in the 1960s when they were the most thuggish gang in America.
It's always had an ironic ring to it.


92 posted on 03/17/2006 12:24:15 PM PST by jjmcgo (Patriarch of the Occident since March 1, 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
"Sorry, but as a smoker I get a big chuckle out of this."

Chance are good that a large proportion of the drinkers are also smokers, so laugh away.

93 posted on 03/17/2006 12:27:20 PM PST by Sam Cree (absolute reality) - ("Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one." Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: jjmcgo

I grew up next to Greatersford State Prison, not too far from Trenton. Same establishments, same ilk. Unspeakable persons motivated by unbalanced thinking and intoxicants. Then they go home if the local "rooms for rent" place is full and the restraining order is more than three months old.


94 posted on 03/17/2006 12:27:42 PM PST by blackdog (Forever re-timing flap tuckers. Hell is maintaining what stupid engineers sold to even dumber execs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: billorites

TABC is trying to shut down the Dallas night club in Austin because too many DWI arrests were patrons of the club. Of course, the APD made a habit of parking in the club's lot and following the 'suspects' on to the roadway.


95 posted on 03/17/2006 12:29:02 PM PST by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
Note to self......

Tip your bartender well. He may be shootin fish for the local five-o. Cheapskates served up willingly.

96 posted on 03/17/2006 12:30:17 PM PST by blackdog (Forever re-timing flap tuckers. Hell is maintaining what stupid engineers sold to even dumber execs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Deguello

It's Tater Salad.


97 posted on 03/17/2006 12:30:22 PM PST by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: billorites

Now's a good time for Two Minutes of Hate. This is ridiculous.


98 posted on 03/17/2006 12:32:49 PM PST by rattrap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mugwump

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1597573/posts

See this post, for more nanny state banning. We knew it would happen sooner or later.


99 posted on 03/17/2006 12:39:34 PM PST by 383rr (Those who choose security over liberty deserve neither- GUN CONTOL=SLAVERY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider

Here's your sign: you're "not sure" and "some people (you)know."

Any freedom lover knows perfectly well this is wrong while you're "not sure..."

Ok, I accept some of the people you "know" in your response are not necessarily friends.


100 posted on 03/17/2006 12:41:30 PM PST by takenoprisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-205 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson