Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservative Baby Boom, Liberal Baby Bust
NewsMax.com ^ | 03/17/2006 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 03/17/2006 10:02:54 AM PST by SirLinksalot

Conservative Baby Boom, Liberal Baby Bust

In a trend that’s found worldwide as well as in the U.S., liberals are much less likely to have children than conservatives.

That trend "augers a far more conservative future — one in which patriarchy and other traditional values make a comeback, if only by default,” Phillip Longman, a fellow at the New America Foundation, writes in an essay in USA Today.

"Childlessness and small families are increasingly the norm today among progressive secularists. As a consequence, an increasing share of all children born into the world are descended from a share of the population whose conservative values have led them to raise large families.”

Conservatives, most of whom are pro-life, are also less likely to have abortions than are their politically liberal counterparts. Liberals, in essence, may be killing their own future through abortion.

Longman points to these figures:

In the U.S., 47 percent of people who attend church weekly say their ideal family size is three or more children, but only 27 percent of those who seldom attend church feel that way.

In Utah, where more than two-thirds of residents are members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 92 children are born each year for every 1,000 women. Vermont — the first state to embrace gay unions — has the nation's lowest rate: 51 children per 1,000 women.

The average fertility rate in states that voted for President Bush in 2004 is more than 11 percent higher than the rate in states that voted for Sen. John Kerry.

Demographic data show that in Europe today, progressives who say they find soft drugs, homosexuality and euthanasia acceptable are far more likely to live alone or be in childless, cohabiting unions than those with more conservative views. Longman also points out that nearly 20 percent of American women born in the late 1950s are reaching the end of their reproductive lives without having children.

Therefore, "the greatly expanded childless segment of contemporary society, whose members are drawn disproportionately from the feminist and countercultural movements of the 1960s and '70s, will leave no genetic legacy,” writes Longman, author of "The Empty Cradle: How Falling Birthrates Threaten World Prosperity and What to Do About It.”

He concludes that tomorrow's children "will be for the most part descendants of a comparatively narrow and culturally conservative segment of society.”

The USA Today essay was adapted from a story in Foreign Policy magazine.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: babyboom; babybust; conservative; liberal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
Question : Will this demographic trend stabilize, be reversed as the blue states realize they are being out-bred, or will the trend continue for the next 25 years ?
1 posted on 03/17/2006 10:02:57 AM PST by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

In a trend that’s found worldwide as well as in the U.S., liberals are much less likely to have children than conservatives.



Well duh! Abortion and Gay Marriage? They are breeding themselves out of existence.


2 posted on 03/17/2006 10:04:09 AM PST by trubluolyguy (Islam is a Cult of Death that has been infiltrated by a few non-violent believers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

They still have control of the schools where they are indoctrinated.


3 posted on 03/17/2006 10:04:17 AM PST by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

My twin daughters will be going to a Catholic shool prek through 12.


4 posted on 03/17/2006 10:05:49 AM PST by TXBSAFH (Proud Dad of Twins, What Does Not Kill You Makes You Stronger!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TXBSAFH

shool =school.


5 posted on 03/17/2006 10:06:12 AM PST by TXBSAFH (Proud Dad of Twins, What Does Not Kill You Makes You Stronger!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

He seems to be forgetting the tens of millions of illegal aliens that out-breed even conservatives and, if illegal immigration continues at the present pace, will eventually become the dominant group in the U.S.


6 posted on 03/17/2006 10:08:18 AM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

They still have the dead vote locked up.


7 posted on 03/17/2006 10:08:32 AM PST by Caveman Lawyer (Cluckin' defiance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TXBSAFH

Twin daughters... Sheesh! How old are they? Did you get any sleep when they were babies? I could only imagine.


8 posted on 03/17/2006 10:08:56 AM PST by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

Proud patriarch checking in here...


9 posted on 03/17/2006 10:10:07 AM PST by Antoninus (The only reason you're alive today is because your parents were pro-life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
Question : Will this demographic trend stabilize, be reversed as the blue states realize they are being out-bred, or will the trend continue for the next 25 years ?

No. Leftists would not have children just to counter conservatives. Children are too demanding of one's time and energy, and leftists would rather spend their time in self-indulgence.

One thing this article doesn't mention is the large families that immigrants are having. Where do they stand politically? What about the large welfare families in this country? How about illegals?

10 posted on 03/17/2006 10:10:23 AM PST by TheMightyQuinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

Republicans are better looking.


11 posted on 03/17/2006 10:11:35 AM PST by YouPosting2Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

8 1/2 months. I gave up sleep for lent.


12 posted on 03/17/2006 10:14:21 AM PST by TXBSAFH (Proud Dad of Twins, What Does Not Kill You Makes You Stronger!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

Proud to say that my daughter cast her vote for GWB in her very first Presidential election in 2004.


13 posted on 03/17/2006 10:16:00 AM PST by texianyankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texianyankee

Smart girl.


14 posted on 03/17/2006 10:17:26 AM PST by Ashamed Canadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TXBSAFH

God bless you. :)


15 posted on 03/17/2006 10:17:41 AM PST by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: texianyankee
Proud to say that my daughter cast her vote for GWB in her very first Presidential election in 2004

Oh you kid, my grand daughter cast her first one.

16 posted on 03/17/2006 10:21:35 AM PST by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

I've lost count of the babies born just in our church family in the past five years. Several with toddlers are pregnant again. It's great to see! They have four, five, six children and they are all blossoming. (No, they aren't flower children--smile.)


17 posted on 03/17/2006 10:21:54 AM PST by Marysecretary (Thank you, Lord, for FOUR MORE YEARS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

This assumes that the children of coservatives will also be conservative. Rebellion against parental values will asure that many kids will at least be libs through their 20's.

And of course, that is vice versa for liberal parents. Out of the 5 kids my ultraliberal parents had (all in their 50's now), 2 are conservative 2 moderate...and one still quite wacky lib.


18 posted on 03/17/2006 10:22:11 AM PST by fizziwig (Democrats: so far off the path, so incredibly vicious, so sadly pathetic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ashamed Canadian

Thanks. She was only 18 at the time, too. She really made me a very proud dad when she broke the news to me.


19 posted on 03/17/2006 10:22:16 AM PST by texianyankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
"They still have control of the schools where they are indoctrinated."

Not all the schools. I'm a homeschooling father of six (and counting). All my kids are being raised with a solidly conservative, God fearing, patriotic worldview. (In 2004, the oldest ones had their crayons and markers out along with their photocopied maps of the US. Every time Bush took a state, they colored it red and cheered. We had a blast. It was like a Republican war room.)

Public education will always be with us. But its continuing failure will further marginalize it as desperate parents and educational entrepreneurs find better alternatives. Eventually, public education will be recognized for what it is - educational welfare for those who can't afford or won't seek an alternative.
20 posted on 03/17/2006 10:24:43 AM PST by Shadowfax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson