Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man Sought for Backyard Dungeon Rapes
Associated Press ^ | JOHN C. DRAKE

Posted on 03/17/2006 6:37:49 AM PST by 300magnum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Toby06

The problem with that is that everyone is entitled to defense under the law. Punishing defense attorneys for providing a required service is just silly.


41 posted on 03/17/2006 8:42:30 AM PST by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard
You're right. Another place we may not want to go is letting judges put citizens away forever for crimes that they MIGHT commit in the future.

Finish the sentences; ...based on crimes which they ACTUALLY committed in the past and the considered opinion of those responsible for evaluating their fitness to re-enter society and the likely hood of them committing such crimes again in the future.

42 posted on 03/17/2006 8:43:54 AM PST by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick

---Punishing defense attorneys for providing a required service is just silly.





I no longer believe the Defense Atty is doing a required service. Fabricating, lying, manipulating, race baiting, agenda driving - this is not acceptable Defense actions.


43 posted on 03/17/2006 10:08:56 AM PST by roofgoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: CMAC51

I have had the same thoughts as your post. I think judges are doing as they please and it is not always in the best interests of society or the victims. Look at the case of Shasta Groene. That monster was released and went on to murder and torture. The Groene case alone should have made judges wise up to sex offenders. I am just disgusted with everything to do with sex offenders right now. I support Jessicas Law. But honestly I think since these monsters can do these horrible acts on children then they should be dead, why give them a chance to repeat and ruin more children's lives? I don't think sex offenders deserve any rights. I've been told I am barbaric so I guess its true. Its just all so disgusting and sickening to see these monsters get out to repeat while the victim is scarred for life.


44 posted on 03/17/2006 12:15:55 PM PST by pandoraou812 (dilligaf and barbaric !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard

Greatest good for greatest number. Multilation of children SHOULD rank with rape and murder.


45 posted on 03/17/2006 12:42:44 PM PST by GVnana (Former Alias: GVgirl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: 300magnum

Why can't the family of the girls sue the judge for damages?


46 posted on 03/17/2006 12:55:11 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (The Internet is the samizdat of liberty..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: speedy; pandoraou812
They should have named the judge in the story. This one is on him.

Circuit Judge Edward Cottingham

Judge rejected sex offender's petition for rehab program

47 posted on 03/17/2006 1:19:09 PM PST by Between the Lines (Be careful how you live your life, it may be the only gospel anyone reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TASMANIANRED

I'm no lawyer, but it's probably not possible to sue a judge for damages. I haven't ever heard of it before.


48 posted on 03/17/2006 1:20:41 PM PST by 300magnum (We know that if evil is not confronted, it gains in strength and audacity, and returns to strike us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: GVnana

But you did not answer the question. Are you comfortable putting people away for crimes that they MIGHT commit?


49 posted on 03/17/2006 1:42:00 PM PST by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: 300magnum

Why not?

Unless there is a specific law that indemnifies judges for their decisions then why can't they be sued just like a doctor.

Judge malpracticed, he made a bad decision and someone was harmed.


50 posted on 03/17/2006 2:04:38 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (The Internet is the samizdat of liberty..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

Thanks for your research. Hopes this gets some circulation.


51 posted on 03/17/2006 3:19:38 PM PST by speedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard; Fairview
I'd just like to point out that in Virginia, at least, parole boards never release criminals into society. They can't ... they don't exist. We abolished parole in the early 1990s.

Not according to the code of Virginia. Title 53.1.

Section 53.1-134 Creation of Parole Board; appointment of members.

There shall be a Parole Board which shall consist of up to five members appointed by the Governor and subject to confirmation by the General Assembly, if in session when such appointment is made, and if not in session, then at its next succeeding session. At least one member of the Parole Board shall be a representative of a crime victims' organization or a victim of crime as defined in subsection B of § 19.2-11.01.

The members of the Parole Board shall serve at the pleasure of the Governor.

It goes on, covering 53 sections dealing with parole. http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+TOC53010000004000000000000
52 posted on 03/17/2006 3:36:33 PM PST by usapatriot28
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
It's the frickin' LAW that is the problem, not the judges!

I have a bridge for sale...

53 posted on 03/17/2006 3:40:46 PM PST by pageonetoo (You'll spot their posts soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 300magnum

Fox reports this creep was apprehended this evening. Read more here:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,188200,00.html


54 posted on 03/17/2006 8:52:45 PM PST by IM2MAD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard

Your question presumes no crime was committed in the first place. It doesn't make sense.


55 posted on 03/18/2006 5:12:06 AM PST by GVnana (Former Alias: GVgirl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: 300magnum

Judge Edward Cottingham is the name of the judge who said the state did not prove he would offend again.

http://www.wistv.com/Global/story.asp?S=4636498

South Carolina Freepers and citizens need to hold this judge accountable.


56 posted on 03/18/2006 5:26:58 AM PST by Brytani (Democrats - destroying America since 1868)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
South Carolina Sex Offenders
 
Sex Offender Mugshot
Offender Information
Name: HINSON, KENNETH GLENN
Sexual Predator: No
Sex: Male
Race: W
DOB: 1958-08-29
Height: 6' 01"
Weight: 155 lbs.
Eye Color: Blue
Hair Color: Brown
Skin Tone: Medium Brown
Addresses
Address: 2705 WHITE RIDGE
HARTSVILLE, 29550
County: Darlington Status: Residence
Start Date:
End Date:

Criminal Charges
Offense:
Statute: 16-3-653 Date of Conviction: 1991-10-21
Literal: CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONDUCT - SECOND DEGREE State of Conviction: SC
Age Of Victim: 12 Sex Of Victim: F
Weapon: Knife/Cutting Instrument Sentence Release Date:
Probation Release Date:

Additional Identifiers
Name(s): HINSON, KENNETH GLENN
Registration Information
Type of Registering Agency: SO
Date of Pre-Registration: 2003-04-01
Last Annual Registration Date: 2005-10-21
Date of Photograph: 2005-10-21

57 posted on 03/18/2006 5:28:03 AM PST by Brytani (Democrats - destroying America since 1868)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GVnana

Clearly, you don't want to answer the question, so you try to undermine it. The validity of the question does not depend upon any presumption I have or have not made.

To be as straightforward as possible, while I might be inclined to harsher sentences upon conviction for crimes actually committed, I am not comfortable with putting people away for crimes they MIGHT commit in the future, or for failing some sort of government-mandated psychological profile. Are you?


58 posted on 03/20/2006 6:17:08 AM PST by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard
You're asking me if I still beat my wife?

The only reason that I can see for someone demanding "government-mandated psychological profiles" is if they have some doubt about the punishment fitting the crime.

I don't have any such doubts. But apparently some judges do.

59 posted on 03/20/2006 1:00:39 PM PST by GVnana (Former Alias: GVgirl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Brytani

Is this the same trial in which the guy was just acquited yesterday?


60 posted on 04/24/2007 1:37:49 PM PDT by Muzzle_em (A proud warrior of the Pajamahadeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson