Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Modeled After Wal-Mart Law Would Apply to Smaller Firms
WJLA 7 News ^ | March 16, 2006

Posted on 03/17/2006 12:21:05 AM PST by beaversmom

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Modok

That was neat, get became bet when it posted.


21 posted on 03/17/2006 4:40:42 AM PST by Modok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

This will end up raising taxes; they should pay more attention to what is happening with South Carolina. The tobacco settlements are tied to sales of tobacco; tobacco sales are down so they could reduce the amount of settlement money the state had come to rely on. They may have to raise taxes to make up the difference.

Same thing here. If the state gets used to getting the 4.5% from a bunch of companies that can't or won't pay for healthcare, then later those companies come into 'compliance,' the gov't will experience a shortfall that you can bet they won't overcome by tightening their belts.


22 posted on 03/17/2006 4:52:45 AM PST by Diggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dahoser
Whether it's a Wal-Mart first, everyone second type law such as this, or anti-smoking laws, state legislatures are hardly the bastions of reason away from the mob. Increasingly, they are the mob.

Yeah, a mob of Fascists. This Wal-Mart law BS is right out of the Communist Manifesto.....

23 posted on 03/17/2006 5:21:14 AM PST by Thermalseeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Modok
That was neat, get became bet when it posted.

Solbr flxres.

24 posted on 03/17/2006 6:08:18 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Now is the time for all good customes agents in Tiajunna to come to the aid of their stuned beebers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

Won't some employees just have their salaries lowered by 4.5 percent in response to this thing if it becomes law. When I worked for a beer and wine store in Montgomery County back in 1999, I just got cash payed every week, no health benefits.

I question whether my old boss would have just paid an additional five percent to the state ON TOP of my weekly earnings, since his business is in a quite competitive market.


25 posted on 03/17/2006 6:12:49 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Now is the time for all good customes agents in Tiajunna to come to the aid of their stuned beebers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker

I am a small employer, but so are many businesses. This will be yet another tax that will make me wonder if I am working for myself or as a tax collector. After getting my taxes done yesterday and seeing that I owe yet another pile of money to these deadbeats, I am seriously thinking about letting my people go and finding something to do that doesn't involve sending half my money to the many government entities that think I work for them.


26 posted on 03/17/2006 6:17:15 AM PST by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

Do I read this to include places like McDonalds, Wendy's, etc., who hire teens part time?

I can't see anyone thinking this is a good idea (except those employees of government who constitute too large a percentage of the state's population).


27 posted on 03/17/2006 5:41:16 PM PST by Abby4116
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson