To: joseph20
Yup. They're printing it and yet saying "pay no attention to it" at the same time.
Keeping their agenda going requires more contortions than an acrobat in a pretzel factory.
7 posted on
03/16/2006 11:22:53 PM PST by
JennysCool
(Liberals don't care what you do, as long as it's mandatory.)
To: JennysCool; NormsRevenge; Marine_Uncle; Grampa Dave; tubebender; onyx; sam_paine; joseph20; Dog; ...
It's gonna get good, this is just barely starting!
To: JennysCool; joseph20
"the sourcing is questionable"An MSM first!
32 posted on
03/17/2006 12:36:15 AM PST by
endthematrix
(None dare call it ISLAMOFACISM!)
To: JennysCool
"Limited evidentiary value...."
They are going to insist these all be treated according to rules of US criminal law, as promulgated by defense bar.
What does anyone expect? Yesterday, after it was reported that there were no casualties from Op Swarmer, we had David Gregory ranting about "this great bloody battle". I haven't even been able to escape to History or Discovery Channel. It seems at least once in every program, there is a gratuitous contemporary political comment.
At least the docs are getting attention.
To: JennysCool
Meanwhile " unnamed administration sources( ie the janitor in the WH basement)" are taken as purveyors of absolute fact.
52 posted on
03/17/2006 4:45:36 AM PST by
Kozak
(Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson