Revenge of the "Queers"

FrontPage Magazine ^ | 3/16/06 | Ann Coulter

[jiggyboy]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1597082/posts

[BullDog108]

[mathprof]

Sorry, I did search but didn't find it :(

[trisham]

Allen isn't even working for the Bush administration anymore. Yet the Times is wallowing in his agony. I've never seen people enjoy another person's private pain so much – at least not since a prosecutor started investigating Rush Limbaugh for taking too many back pain pills.

***************

Good article, Ann.

[Rummyfan]

It's a duplicate - in fact I think it's at least the third posting - but it deserves a picture anyway!

[Cruz]

ping

[advance_copy]

Duplicate postings of Ann Coulter brilliance are absolutely honorable, so long as they are accompanied by the requisite photographs.

[EagleUSA]

She is such a classic. She has the libs pegged so well, her writings always are spot-on and entertaining to say the least.

"A small part of Times Executive Editor Bill Keller dies every time the paper is forced to mention any black top officials in the Bush administration. It might remind people that the most highly placed black in the Clinton administration was his secretary, Betty Currie."

So true -- the hypocrisy of the left is so blatant, they don't even rate "stupid" anymore, as a mental classification.

[Issaquahking]

Ann proves there is no bag limit on liberals!!!

[conserv13]

Whatever, Ann. The guy is a thief.

[xzins]

Did I miss the trial?

I heard that at this point he's been accused, but that he disputes it.

[conserv13]

You're right, I should not be so quick to judge.

[beckett]

But why the hell is the guy stealing from department stores? There is no excuse for it! He's a thief, and theives by definition have no integrity.

He was given a privileged position of responsibility by the President of the United States, and he proceeded to betray that trust. I have a lot of trouble finding any sympathy for him.

[MarineBrat]

I was under the impression that people were innocent until proven guilty? If I say you stole something from me, that makes you just as guilty as this man is.

[fish hawk]

Hint: if you put the two words, "Ann Coulter", in your headlines, your readership would grow by fourfold.

[beckett]

Yeah...ok...the police have no evidence, they've trumped up the charges out or thin air. And Allen resigned because of an ingrown toe nail or some such. And of course, he certainly is not on tape at any of the Target stores. And no items seen on those non-existent tapes were found in his possession.

Yeah....it's all just hogwash. Move along, nothing to see here.

[beckett]

I was under the impression that people were innocent until proven guilty?

Oh, and one more thing about this widely misunderstood provision in the constitution. It applies only to judge and jurors in a court of law. As a free man with freedom of conscience in a free country, I'm entitled to form an opinion on any matter whenever I choose and however I choose, based upon my own reading of the available facts, and no moral opprobrium attaches to my choice.

Yes, defendants in criminal cases are protected by a useful provision in the constitution which requires prosecutors to prove their charges with potent evidence, but that constitutional provision does not also deprive me or any citizen from declaring an opinion on any matter at any time.

[ozzymandus]

I believe Ann's point was not to assert the man's innocence, but to show how the NYT and the rest of the MSM will not mention black people in the Bush administration. It's unfortunate that you're so fixated on presuming this guy's guilt that you can't see that. Ann wasn't saying he's innocent, she was commenting on the Times' hypocrisy.

[MarineBrat]

Yeah...ok...the police have no evidence, they've trumped up the charges out or thin air.

You just fly from one extreme to another, don't you?