Posted on 03/15/2006 8:11:39 PM PST by doesnt suffer fools gladly
And, what the hell, I will add my two cents about the astonishing sex appeal of Jessica Simpson. I don't see it. She is pretty in her way, but that's it. The previous (original?) Daisy Duke, Catherine Bach, was more attractive.
fear of her peers
standing up to the hatred for Conservatism found in the infrastructure of Hollywood and the entertainment industry takes juevos
Yes indeed, the title sure had the effect it was meant to have for some who posted here. Good observation, TChad.
I could not agree more. If we don't want the George and Babs of the world to insert themselves into politics , we shouldn't want Jessica to either.
She is dumb as a rock, but she is "smart" enough to see that the puppetmasters who call the shots, and who deem what is relevant and "hot" would punish her for meeting with the President.
A nice Christian girl selling her soul to the devil in the REAL Sin City...what else is new?
The totals for this round: Evil-1, Good-0.
Perhaps, but to be fair some people might see it that way. If celebrity X went to a fundraiser for Howard Dean, Hillary Clinton, or John Kerry, we wouldn't interpret it so charitably. That's why, I can see giving her the benefit of the doubt, since so many of us say, "shut up and sing." The unfortunate part is that it might seem like a snub, since it seems like she is withfrawing her commitment to go.
I don't think that involving oneself in a charity for children is selling your soul to the devil. The cause is worthy, and politics should not play a part in it, IMHO.
This is as much a critique of Bush as it is Simpson. Why should we be courting a slut?
This piece of white trash? Why would we invite her to begin with? Since when is she a role model for conservative children? I'm angry that they feel snubbed.
ping
Well, wait a second, if you think it would be OK for her to go to a GOP Fundraiser and not influence how people perceive her charity, then for you to be honest you would have to give her the same same standard of treatment if she was a dim.
Well is it chicken or is it fish, Nick?
Details at 11:00.
It could have been worse, her sister could have agreed to show up and sing.
She's certainly not a Great Beauty, but I think she's very pretty (in a generic fashion) when she's got on the powder and paint and all the accoutrements of beauty . . . but when she doesn't, her face is just so so (as was evident on "Newlyweds", yes I watched it).
She looks great from the hips on up, but her legs there look like they came from a muscular midget.
She has that generic MTV look.. You know, the wide brown eyes, the same face as Ricky Martin, Britany Spears, Ashton Kutcher..Someone told me there is an actual policy at that abomination of a company that has this look as the standard for their "stars", that they have whittled it down to this being the "perfect" face to sell whatever sheit they are selling.
Wonder what she looks like without the makeup and air brushing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.