Posted on 03/15/2006 3:09:31 PM PST by theworkersarefew
On his first big vote since being elected majority leader, Rep. John Boehner (R.-Ohio) angered House conservatives by thwarting their attempt to offset with unused government funds the $91.8 billion that President Bush has requested for military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and Hurricane Katrina recovery.
Boehner avoided embarrassment when the GOP won the procedural vote, 218-200. But in the process, 29 conservative Republican Study Committee members bucked their party leadership, and according to several Capitol Hill aides who spoke to HUMAN EVENTS, those members are very much displeased with Boehner. (See who opposed the bill below.)
“He cut off the hand that fed him,” lamented one senior House aide, referring to the support conservatives gave Boehner last month when he won his post as GOP leader.
“The bottom line is that they’re allowing votes on amendments that increase spending,” the aide said. “But they’re not allowing votes on amendments that decrease spending.”
Leading the opposition to the plan were Reps. Mike Pence (R.-Ind.), the RSC’s chairman, and Jeb Hensarling (R.-Tex.), who has taken a lead role on spending issues. Pence and Hensarling unveiled the RSC’s “alternative budget” last week, drawing widespread praise from conservatives.
Hensarling tried to offer an amendment before the House Rules Committee that would have offset the entire $91.8 billion supplemental with unobligated funds—money the Bush Administration won’t spend in 2006.
Hensarling also wanted House Appropriations Chairman Jerry Lewis (R.-Calif.) to split the two requests: $67.6 billion for funding the troops and $19.1 billion for hurricane recovery. But Lewis chose to combine them, leaving Republicans few options to strip what they view as wasteful spending included in the hurricane recovery bill.
“Many conservatives want to support funding for the war,” said one House staffer, “but some have concerns about excessive spending on hurricane package.”
Ultimately, it was Boehner’s decision, along with other members of the House Republican leadership, to put forth a bill that will add nearly $100 billion to the government’s burden with any offsets.
Boehner spokesman Kevin Madden said the majority leader supports the RSC’s efforts to reduce wasteful spending.
“Mr. Boehner worked together with many members of the conference about various concerns,” Madden said. “And, of course it's very important to Mr. Boehner that there be an ongoing dialogue about reforms to cut wasteful spending and the RSC's role in realizing that goal.”
During a press briefing with reporters Tuesday, Boehner responded to questions about the conservatives’ attempt to restore fiscal prudence.
“I am for reducing spending,” Boehner said in response to a question about the RSC’s plan to require offsets. “There hadn't been a discussion yet about their proposal in the leadership, and depending upon how they go about it, there is a question about whether it is germane to the process.”
Over the next 22 hours, the House GOP leadership, under Boehner’s direction, thwarted Hensarling’s plan to offset the entire supplemental spending request. (He is unable to offer it on the House floor because of rules about appropriations bills that I won’t even try to explain.)
At yesterday’s press briefing, a reporter bluntly asked Boehner: “But if efforts by the Republican Study Committee to reduce spending get defeated, what is the message that goes out to the conservatives who you would be counting on in this year's election?”
Boehner’s response: “I don't know.”
Conservatives in the House haven’t given up hope entirely. Rep. Randy Neugebauer (R.-Tex.) has introduced an amendment that would separate the two spending bills. Neugebauer said the measures deserved to be debated independently on the House floor.
“Fighting the War on Terror and rebuilding the Gulf Coast are two different issues and deserve to be considered on their own merits,” Neugebauer said. “Doing so will allow Congress to remove any funding that is not truly critical or that is unrelated to these two emergencies.”
House Republicans Voting ‘No’
Akin
Chabot
Davis, Jo Ann
Flake
Forbes
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Garrett (NJ)
Gohmert
Green (WI)
Gutknecht
Hayworth
Hefley
Hensarling
Hostettler
Jones (NC)
King (IA)
Lungren, Daniel E.
Musgrave
Neugebauer
Otter
Pence
Poe
Ryan (WI)
Ryun (KS)
Shadegg
Stearns
Tancredo
Westmoreland
Too much tan and too many Pall Malls. Too little spine.
It has been said that his tan is from a LOT more time on the golf course than in his district doing the people's business...and some are NOT happy about it.
ping
Before we lose everything we have won, BRING BACK THE HAMMER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LLS
PING
That about sums up the Republican "leadership", from Bush on down.
BOEHNER = status quo
Call your Congressman and get them to cut spending and support THE CONTRACT with AMerica II
My man Joel Helfey, voted NO. Thank you sir.
They all get more conservative when they are about to retire!
Well .. that's what happens when you put a MODERATE in charge. They ride the fence!
The repubs will never learn. Bowing to the dems who are over the cliff already is more stupid than I can find words to say.
Cong Hefley has 96 lifetime ACU rating. Tancredo 98 and Pence 99. You won't find three more solid conservatives in the HOR.
Just another spinless pretty face.
We here predicted this. Another wimp.
Hey guys, please spend all of my future.
Boehner talks about it as if some other guy runs the show. If there has not been a discussion, it's because he doesn't want one.
Boehner goes on to say: "...and depending upon how they go about it, there is a question about whether it is germane to the process.”
Well, he tipped his hand right there. Based on that answer, he'd already decided how he was going to play it. He didn't even try to make it sound like he was open to ideas by serving up the customary niceties about how he looks forward to looking at all options, etc. No, he just tosses off a lame dismissal. "Germane to the process." Give me a break.
new pol-speak term: "Yeah, that loser really pulled a Boehner"
But Tom Delay was the real enemy. [sarcasm]
No kidding.
Remember when "conservatives" pegged Delay as the REAL enemy for saying there was no room for cuts? Few weeks later Delay comes back and admits he's wrong. Anyone see this new guy doing that? Nope.
Conservatives didn't know what they had, when they had it. Now we have no ANWR, a House rebellion over the ports...and I don't care where people fall on it. When a Congresswoman sends a missive to the President saying "hell No" there is no discipline in that House. Now this.
Am I saying I told people so? Hell yes. Because the same idiots were responsible for getting Frist as ML, then have the nerve to complain about Frist's lack of leadership. Conservatives damn well deserve what they got here. They stuck a knife in Delay's back, never capable of realizing the fact he was GOOD at his job was an ASSET considering Delay was NOT hostile toward conservatives.
Delay for Majority Leader. I refuse to acknowledge the pretender to the "throne".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.