Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry
"Now we have a little dinosaur that belongs to coelurosaurs that does not show feathers. This is a problem."

Maybe it died from a disease that made its feathers fall out; or maybe it died after moulting. Hard to draw firm conclusions based on a single data point.

21 posted on 03/15/2006 12:49:02 PM PST by longshadow (FReeper #405, entering his ninth year of ignoring nitwits, nutcases, and recycled newbies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: longshadow
I agree. A while ago, there was a thread about some partial footprints that were found somewhere.

The scientists said this was an exciting discovery because these partial footprints belonged to an aqauatic dinosaur, that was a vegetarian, and a precursor to birds.

I said "Whoa! That's a lot of conjecture! It's hard to draw such firm conclusions from a single data point."

'Course the Evos shouted me down and called me a fool.

24 posted on 03/15/2006 12:52:57 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (Never question Bruce Dickinson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: longshadow; PatrickHenry
"Now we have a little dinosaur that belongs to coelurosaurs that does not show feathers. This is a problem."

There are no problems in science, only opportunities.

I think this is fascinating. If this isn't some aberration, it means that there were closely related species, some with feathers, some without.

One possibility is that feathers evolved more than once. I think this is highly likely. This means it should be possible to find different genes for feathers from widely divergent modern bird species. Unless of course, the line went extinct.

45 posted on 03/15/2006 1:26:59 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson