To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
14 posted on
03/15/2006 12:43:14 PM PST by
PatrickHenry
(Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
To: PatrickHenry
"Now we have a little dinosaur that belongs to coelurosaurs that does not show feathers. This is a problem." Maybe it died from a disease that made its feathers fall out; or maybe it died after moulting. Hard to draw firm conclusions based on a single data point.
21 posted on
03/15/2006 12:49:02 PM PST by
longshadow
(FReeper #405, entering his ninth year of ignoring nitwits, nutcases, and recycled newbies)
To: PatrickHenry
It's not terribly shattering if there was a coelurosaur with no feathers. Not all of the traits that define a group have to appear at the same time. Traits can disappear. There's a mammal called a pangolin that has scales all over its body. Is that a problem for evolution or an atavism that points to a reptilian origin for mammals?
34 posted on
03/15/2006 1:06:02 PM PST by
VadeRetro
(I have the updated "Your brain on creationism" on my homepage.)
To: PatrickHenry
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson