Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dubai company describes plans to sell U.S. port operations
San Diego Union (AP) ^ | 3-15-06 | Ted Bridis

Posted on 03/15/2006 8:54:02 AM PST by clawrence3

WASHINGTON – A Dubai-owned company said Wednesday it plans to sell all its U.S. port operations within four to six months to an unrelated American buyer and laid out new details about how it plans to pursue the sale under pressure from Congress. DP World said that until the sale is finalized, its U.S. businesses will be operated independently.

(Excerpt) Read more at signonsandiego.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: congressmorons; dubai; ports; uae
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last
Sullivan and Cromwell LLP will act as legal advisor.
1 posted on 03/15/2006 8:54:06 AM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
Politics and Strategy After the Dubai Ports Case
2 posted on 03/15/2006 8:55:48 AM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3

We sent the wrong message on that one.


3 posted on 03/15/2006 8:57:00 AM PST by U S Army EOD (LINCOLN COUNTY RED DEVILS STATE CHAMPIONS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
I think, after the shabby way we treated DPW, it would serve us right if they just closed up the ports and told the Longshoreman, Democrats and hide-under-the-bed Republicans to go screw!
4 posted on 03/15/2006 8:57:46 AM PST by MCCRon58 (Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach. Those who do neither, complain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: U S Army EOD

Screwed the pooch.


5 posted on 03/15/2006 8:59:17 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Our enemies act on ecstatic revelations from their god. We act on the advice of lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3

How come all of a sudden Schumer is so fired up about "national security." He doesn't seem to care about it in any other situation. I'm sure there is no self-interest involved.


6 posted on 03/15/2006 9:01:13 AM PST by speedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
This was a political stunt by the Media/Congressional street whores.

DPW will, when the dust is settled, get what it wanted.

7 posted on 03/15/2006 9:01:50 AM PST by zarf (It's time for a college football playoff system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MCCRon58
Good point. That's exactly what DPW should do. After all, if they are so evil and untrustworthy why are they being allowed 4-6 months to bring God knows what in to this country. Shut the ports until Halliburtan can take over.
8 posted on 03/15/2006 9:02:30 AM PST by wingnut1971
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Sorry, but I will not endorse the feds throwing even more money at the problem or any attempt to cripple foreign investment - it has steadily been recovering since 9/11 and the recession: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1596600/posts


9 posted on 03/15/2006 9:02:34 AM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: U S Army EOD; MCCRon58

Agreed.


10 posted on 03/15/2006 9:03:20 AM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: speedy
You are aware that P&O competitor, Eller, down in Miami has lobbied Schumer?
11 posted on 03/15/2006 9:04:24 AM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MCCRon58
I didn't know they could do that. I thought the supporters of this deal were telling us over and over again that DPW wasn't being given "control" of our ports. Is that information all of the sudden wrong?

By the way, nice job rooting against your own country.

12 posted on 03/15/2006 9:05:04 AM PST by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: zarf

zarf:

What DPW "wanted" was a foothold in the U.S. port terminal operation market - currently held by other major FOREIGN companies - I hope we are not thinking about kicking all of them out now too.


13 posted on 03/15/2006 9:05:55 AM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3

Yeah, I was just being sarcastic. Schumer doesn't do anything on the grounds that it would be good for the US.


14 posted on 03/15/2006 9:06:50 AM PST by speedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: speedy
How come all of a sudden Schumer is so fired up about "national security." He doesn't seem to care about it in any other situation.

Deal gives Dubai firm control of 23 U.S. ports - Eller lobbied Schumer - Causing this uproar

15 posted on 03/15/2006 9:06:50 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: speedy
Arabs drop ports deal; S. Fla. firm in running [Eller]
16 posted on 03/15/2006 9:07:57 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

ping


17 posted on 03/15/2006 9:09:28 AM PST by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inquest

They weren't given control of our ports - but you already knew that, right?


18 posted on 03/15/2006 9:13:16 AM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3

bump


19 posted on 03/15/2006 9:13:19 AM PST by lesser_satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inquest
Depend on how you define ports, doesn't it?

As a trucker who goes into and out of the container ports in question on occasion, I define it as the place where freight is on/off load and stored till removes from the area.

DPW would be responsible for paying for the off-loading, and storing of those containers until they left the ports to go to the appropriate end user.(consignee)

Note that there is very little here that has anything to do with national security.

As to rooting against my own country. Perhaps if you spread your ribs, you would see that the only ones rooting against the USA are those who wish to remove our allies in the Terrorist wars by alienating our allies in the Arab world.

But then again, why should I let facts have precedence over fears and feelings?
20 posted on 03/15/2006 9:18:18 AM PST by MCCRon58 (Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach. Those who do neither, complain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson