[freedumb2003]

My point is that evo scientists have in the past INSISTED that creationist scientists (both using the same methods), are in evos opinion NOT scientists...simply because they do not believe in evo.

Ahh -- "creation scientist" is like "physics alchemist."

There is no such thing as "creation science."

Creation is by definition mythology. You objected to my earler use of the word, but you don't have a substitute.

Any debate founded in mythology belongs in the mythology realm (or theology if that is easier to tale).

NOT science.

So from that degree, yes, it is impossible to have a debate with someone who can't properly address the issue at hand.

What would be the point? At some point the so-called "creation scientist" just whips out God and says "{poof} -- you can't argue against God."

[joyspring777]

You are assuming that based on your past experience.

The thing an evo cannot get their hands around, is that their basis is faith too based on their presuppositions that there is no God...which is secular humanism.

A faith!

If you want to talk in terms of pejoratives like myth...we both have one...you just refuse to recognize yours.