Posted on 03/14/2006 1:08:05 PM PST by WaterDragon
"As I have said time and time again, a negotiated settlement is the best solution." -- Kofi Annan, Secretary General of the United Nations
The American ambassador to that non-august body calls the Iran problem one of the great dangers facing the West, and indeed the world. China and Russia have both said they will veto any attempt to create sanctions in the Security Council -- which may be taken to signify that to them Iranian terrorists with their own stock of nukes are less a threat to world peace than was South African apartheid.
Events are shaping the situation like a funnel. Iran is daily reducing Bush's options. Watching, one is left wondering about the forces working on the mullahs.
The scenario under discussion here, as seen from these drippy fern temperate rain forested regions will play out as follows. Before mid-summer, the U.S. will send stealth bombers to slide improved bunker buster bombs down the vent pipes of underground buildings in about a dozen locations in the Dictatorship of Iran. The U.S. will do it for two reasons. First, if we don't, Israel will. Second, if Israel does, the cards in the geopolitical deck will reshuffle in a way that cannot be predicted, except to this extent: it seems almost certain that all bloody hell will break loose. The genie will be freed from his bottle....[more]
(Excerpt) Read more at oregonmag.com ...
Nuclear weapons in the hands of any Irani government is a big deal. Nuclear arms in the hands of any additional countries is a huge deal.
Bush will NOT stand alone---
"with his new bride..."
A Quaker-type who converted to the 2nd Ammendment ended up delivering the critical shot of the battle herself.
(Grace Kelly, wasn't it?)
"Unfortunately for everybody, Iran is formulating it's plans according to the UN, Democrats, and the MSM. They are not listening to the guy that can pull the trigger."
They are also heavily influenced by Russia, who could care less if they are incinerated.
Exactly. As twelve years of Saddam amply demonstrated. "Diplomatic pressure" without a credible military threat lurking in the background is no pressure at all.
(Grace Kelly, wasn't it?)
You're right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.