Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Iraqi Documents show Bush didn't Lie (Yellow Cake in Africa
Newsmax ^

Posted on 03/13/2006 9:11:59 AM PST by jbwbubba

New Iraqi Documents Show Bush Didn't 'Lie'

Newly translated Iraqi documents from Saddam Hussein's regime show that President Bush was factually accurate when he told the nation in his 2003 State of the Union Address that Iraq had recently sought uranium from Africa.

Bush's 16-word statement had formed the basis for the claim adopted by administration critics that "Bush lied" about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs.

But according to the Washington Times today, an unnamed U.S. official reports that "newly translated Iraqi documents . . . tell of Saddam seeking uranium from Africa in the mid-1990s."

The documents also speak of burying prohibited missiles, a government official familiar with the declassification process told the paper.

In his January 2003 address, Bush told the nation:

"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."

The statement prompted former ambassador to Iraq, Joseph Wilson to complain to the New York Times seven months later: "I have little choice but to conclude that some of the intelligence related to Iraq's nuclear weapons program was twisted to exaggerate the Iraqi threat."

The new documents strongly suggest, however, that Wilson was wrong - and that the "Bush lied" mantra adopted by most Democrats since Wilson first made his complaint has been based on bogus information.

Confirmation on African uranium claim offered by Iraqi documents may be just the tip of the iceberg.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Peter Hoekstra told the Washington Times that about 500 hours of Saddam audiotape is still being translated and analyzed by the U.S.

And U.S. Central Command has 48,000 boxes of Iraqi documents, of which the military has delivered just 68 pages to his committee so far.

"I don't want to overstate what is in the documents," Hoekstra told the paper. "[But] I certainly want to get them out because I think people are going to find them very interesting."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 16words; billtierney; bush; cialeak; hoekstra; iraq; iraqdocs; joewilson; josephwilson; nigerflap; petehoekstra; peterhoekstra; plame
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last
To: jbwbubba

>>>"Newly translated Iraqi documents from Saddam Hussein's regime show that President Bush was factually accurate when he told the nation in his 2003 State of the Union Address that Iraq had recently sought uranium from Africa."

The Republican party should plaster photographic replicas of these documents along with the appropriate message on highway signs throughout the nation and in websites and blogs before the next election. The sooner the better.


61 posted on 03/13/2006 12:03:21 PM PST by Hop A Long Cassidy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Everyone's responding to Tonkin's reprint of your post instead of to you!

So, let me say: Excellent points!
You have articulated the problem that frustrates so many of us.


62 posted on 03/13/2006 12:43:03 PM PST by La Enchiladita (Americans do not want a FOR SALE sign on our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: xzins; jbwbubba; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; rdb3; P-Marlowe
"I never thought that the President lied about WMDs."

He didn't. The IAEA refused to let us remove 500 tons of Uranium from Iraq. (You may want to bookmark the following article.)

May 22, 2004

VIENNA – The United States has informed an international agency that oversees nuclear materials that it intends to move hundreds of tons of uranium from a sealed repository south of Baghdad to a more secure location outside Iraq, Western diplomats close to the agency say.

However, the International Atomic Energy Agency has taken the position that the uranium is Iraqi property and the agency "cannot give them permission to remove it," a diplomat said. [snip]

63 posted on 03/13/2006 12:50:15 PM PST by DocRock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: griswold3
Tonight on Hardball with Chris Matthews, The truth has caused Chris to apologize for his rantings about the President.

HA!

Tonight on 'Hardbowel'... “Russ Feingold calls for Bush censure... Was Armitage the Plame leaker?... Is impeachment inevitable?”

64 posted on 03/13/2006 12:55:06 PM PST by johnny7 (“Iuventus stultorum magister”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: KJC1

Correct! Rush had a list of Wilson's lies on his website for quite awhile .. maybe he needs to put it up again just to refresh people's memories.

Or maybe I'll re-type it and post it here - it dynamite.


65 posted on 03/13/2006 12:56:44 PM PST by CyberAnt (Democrats/Old Media: "controversy, crap and confusion" -- Amen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub

Amen! I couldn't agree more!!

Nana


66 posted on 03/13/2006 4:49:03 PM PST by Texas Termite (We have a new star in the heavens :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
Not one peep in the utterly deceitful, democrat party lamestream media.

Not a peep from the executive branch, either. If this President and his staff do not see the need to put forth ducumentary evidence with underlinings and footnotes to draw attention to the most important points, then I see no need for anyone else to take the trouble to do what they find too much work to do themselves. If a man (or adminstration) will not stand up for himself, then he can not really expect support from others. If Mr. Bush thinks that making a few speeches - which is not his strong suit - will turn around his negatives then he is more of an idiot than the Demo-idiots portray him to be. You're losing your base Mr. President!

67 posted on 03/13/2006 5:45:16 PM PST by Socratic (I'll have the roast duck with the mango salsa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
Thanks for the ping. Little by little it will all be revealed.


Image hosting by Photobucket

68 posted on 03/13/2006 10:17:56 PM PST by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN - Support our troops. I *LOVE* my attitude problem! Beware the Enemedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Socratic

BTTT


69 posted on 03/13/2006 10:30:44 PM PST by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN - Support our troops. I *LOVE* my attitude problem! Beware the Enemedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson