[Do not dub me shapka broham]

You first response in this thread was a link to the original fallacious statement made by the banned user, which you refused to disavow when given the opportunity.

In fact, you didn't reply to Mark Levin's statement until comment #205, on the fourth page of this thread.

This argument is so tedious.

[hole_n_one]

You first response in this thread was a link to the original fallacious statement made by the banned user, which you refused to disavow when given the opportunity.

The link was relevant and for you to think that by my simply linking to it I must then find it necessary to disassociate myself from is just plain ol' stupid.

In fact, you didn't reply to Mark Levin's statement until comment #205, on the fourth page of this thread.

If you set your preferences to load 250 replies per page, it would be on the 1st page, smartypants.