Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Do not dub me shapka broham
You first response in this thread was a link to the original fallacious statement made by the banned user, which you refused to disavow when given the opportunity.

The link was relevant and for you to think that by my simply linking to it I must then find it necessary to disassociate myself from is just plain ol' stupid.

In fact, you didn't reply to Mark Levin's statement until comment #205, on the fourth page of this thread.

If you set your preferences to load 250 replies per page, it would be on the 1st page, smartypants.

889 posted on 03/13/2006 5:30:38 PM PST by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 886 | View Replies ]


To: hole_n_one
The link was relevant and for you to think that by my simply linking to it I must then find it necessary to disassociate myself from is just plain ol' stupid.

I cannot believe they are STILL questioning your link to that post and trying to associate you with the remark.

They either haven't been here long or they are deliberately misstating what happened.

Stupid id right. I guess from now on the "new" rule will be that if you dare link a thread or post, you're automatically endorsing the context.

Stupid.

891 posted on 03/13/2006 5:43:34 PM PST by Howlin ("Quick, he's bleeding! Is there a <strike>doctor</strike> reporter in the house?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 889 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson