Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

He (Bush)'s a right-wing ideologue, not a true conservative
LAT ^ | March 12, 2006 | Jeffrey Hart

Posted on 03/12/2006 3:11:35 PM PST by FairOpinion

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: Yardstick
isn't calling Bush a rightwing freemarket ideologue just a snotty way of saying that Bush is a principled believer in free markets?

Yes.

21 posted on 03/12/2006 4:18:14 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: CheyennePress; FairOpinion

<< How can you write so assuredly about weapons not beig in Iraq with the tapes that have recently surfaced? >>

When did a paleo and/or any other kind of effective liberal ever not carefully select the 'facts' that give the best appearance of veracity to his Goebbelisms?


22 posted on 03/12/2006 4:45:05 PM PST by Brian Allen (How arrogant are we to believe our career political-power-lusting lumpen somehow superior to theirs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
And evidence is mounting that the intelligence used to bolster the claims for Iraq's WMD was cherry-picked, politically pressured and, to use intelligence expert Thomas Powers' word, "fabricated."

Not True.

The evidence is mounting that the WMD were moved to Syria.

23 posted on 03/12/2006 5:06:02 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (The Prophet Muhammed, Piss Be Upon Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: georgia2006

The centerpiece.

The centerpiece drives people insane.

This author said, "Iraq is commonly said to be the centerpiece of Bush's presidency."

And that's horse hockey.

Does anyone know what the President's centerpiece is anymore? He does.

Peace and Freedom.

Period.


24 posted on 03/12/2006 5:34:03 PM PST by freema (Proud Marine FRiend, Mom, Aunt, Sister, Friend, Wife, Daughter, Niece)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
And evidence is mounting that the intelligence used to bolster the claims for Iraq's WMD was cherry-picked, politically pressured and, to use intelligence expert Thomas Powers' word, "fabricated." What? No mention of the Downing Street Memo? His leftie friends at Dartmouth will be dissappointed. But on a more interesting note, he actually does a decent job of pointing out why Bush IS a conservative: Fights the terrorists and won't cut and run when things get difficult in Iraq. Shares Reagan's beleif that people across the world desire liberty, and that America will be safer when they get it. Stands up for life here; and yes there are people who like abortion, namely the ones who benefit economically from not having to raise children. Does his best to remove and replace socialist ponzi schemes. If only Congress would follow suit.
25 posted on 03/12/2006 5:35:11 PM PST by UNflagburner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

The whole ball of wax falls apart when you realize that were RR alive today, he'd be very proud of President Bush. In fact, he is right now.


26 posted on 03/12/2006 5:38:53 PM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Opinions are similar to anal orifices. Everyone has one.


27 posted on 03/12/2006 5:42:34 PM PST by verity (The MSM is comprised of useless eaters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

Of course, Buckley was being flippant and would be the first to contradict it, but it reveals a basic point about conservatism and is probably more true than it is false.


28 posted on 03/12/2006 5:46:55 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: georgia2006
What is it about GWB that drives people, both left and right insane

He smiles even wider when you insult him. That's what drives them insane.

29 posted on 03/12/2006 5:49:14 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Something I've been wondering about, when it comes to people on all sides of the political spectrum claiming that Iraq has become a quagmire, a colossal failure, because it's taking so long...

I wonder if any of them know when the Declaration of Independence (of the United States of America) was signed. If so, I wonder if any of them know when the Constitution was ratified. Or if they know when President George Washington was sworn in as the first President of the United States.

Or if we don't want to go back quite so far... When was VE day, signaling the end of WWII in Europe. When did the US troops pull out of Germany, and the rest of theEuropean theater? When was VJ day? When did the US troops pull out of Japan and the rest of the Pacific theater?

I wonder how history might be different today had the press, as well as the rest of these "monday morning quarterbacks" had been writing their drivvel either back in the 18th century, or in the 1940s... My guess is that we'd be speaking different languages today.

Mark

30 posted on 03/12/2006 5:53:13 PM PST by MarkL (When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad Cloven
...The evidence is mounting that the WMD were moved to Syria.

Before the action began in Iraq, and shortly thereafter, there were lots of reports on the movement of the WMD's. But, why haven't the supposedly smartest peole in the intelligence field put forth any proof, and why hasn't this administration revealed it?

I don't agree or disagree with the author. I am just tired of hearing things second hand! I don't know enough to have a defined opinion, but I lean against Mr. Bush more each day. I am tired of illegals, and sick of his spending (yeah, I know he only "proposes" these huge increases)...

Inquiring minds want to know! At least, I sure do! I would definitely like to see who can defeat the Dems in '06 and '08...

31 posted on 03/12/2006 5:56:23 PM PST by pageonetoo (You'll spot their posts soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Good that you posted this. Nothing is wrong with Hart. It matters not one iota that he is at Dartmouth college, Hart is a token Conservative there. He is watching Bush not protect the borders, sign every spending bill Congress hands him, and nation build in Iraq. And he asks, would a true conservative do this? Reasonable people can disagree, but I notice the ad hominems start with post 2. Bush is a new world order globalist, no more, no less. We are getting the new world order whether we like it or not. Every President we will get from here on out will be a new world order globalist, count on it. There will be no more Washingtons, Jeffersons or founding fathers types in general forthcoming. The Constitution and all that flows from it will never be more than a meaningless piece of paper to any future President. They'll pretend to revere the Constitution but it'll always be a ruse. One day there will be a global body of laws, global currency, and the United States will be no more than a province in the global confederation...as VA is to the US, or Fairfax is to VA. We will pay global taxes that are actually called global taxes. There will be global gun control. It will be necessary for our grandchildren to learn Spanish because the growing Latino reconquista la raza movement will insist on it. Think I'm crazy? Do you think any 18th or 19th political observer would be considered sane for predicting the stuff that goes on today? Call me a moonbat if you want but what I'm predicting is being prepared for us already. Have a nice day.


32 posted on 03/12/2006 6:07:02 PM PST by Jason_b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jason_b

where did you see the part about border security, globalization, etc. in Hart's piece, or are you just channeling what he meant?


33 posted on 03/12/2006 7:06:02 PM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

I think Bush using Evangelical Christian terms is what fools people into saying Bush is a right winger. By his social and economic actions, Bush has far more in common with LBJ than he has with Reagan.


34 posted on 03/12/2006 7:57:45 PM PST by RFT1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt
"Some call it realism, but moral equilvalence is its mainstay."

Interesting take. Would you say that this tack has contributed to widespread acceptance of domestic liberalization through moral entropy? The importation of un-American values, rather than vice-versa over the last 50 years? Would you view this as an innovation, or progressivism?

35 posted on 03/12/2006 8:54:42 PM PST by CowboyJay (Rough Riders! Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: UNflagburner
"Shares Reagan's beleif that people across the world desire liberty, and that America will be safer when they get it."

Therein lies the Libertarian fallacy. Not everyone expresses their liberty in the same fashion. Personal expression of liberty is based upon personal ethos. Ethos is based upon mythos. When those of contrary mythos express personal liberty in each other's presence, conflict ensues. Why we all can't just 'get along'.

Suicide bombers were just exercising freedom of religion.

36 posted on 03/12/2006 9:05:12 PM PST by CowboyJay (Rough Riders! Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: everyone

Jeffrey Hart has really lost it.


37 posted on 03/12/2006 9:36:35 PM PST by California Patriot ("That's not Charlie the Tuna out there. It's Jaws.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: CowboyJay

I was referring to the shift from supporting dictators to promoting democracy. Economic ideology is fantasy, in my mind. Some policies work and others do not.


38 posted on 03/13/2006 12:52:56 AM PST by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: CowboyJay
Not everyone expresses their liberty in the same fashion. Personal expression of liberty is based upon personal ethos. Ethos is based upon mythos.

Sure, having freedoms and how you exercise them are different things.

When those of contrary mythos express personal liberty in each other's presence, conflict ensues. Why we all can't just 'get along'.

Right, hence the desire of people in other countries to have a system which allows them to resolve such conflicts without having a dictator simply impose his will.

Suicide bombers were just exercising freedom of religion.

You have a very peculiar defenition of freedom. Personally, I'll take John Paul II's:"Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought."

39 posted on 03/13/2006 3:36:50 AM PST by UNflagburner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt

"I was referring to the shift from supporting dictators to promoting democracy. Economic ideology is fantasy, in my mind."

I was way off. Thanks for the clarification.


40 posted on 03/13/2006 5:32:13 AM PST by CowboyJay (Rough Riders! Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson