Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/11/2006 8:33:29 PM PST by steve86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BearWash
I certainly hope this does not spread to the USA.

It would only be a matter of time until conservative sites are considered 'hate speech'.

Remember, as disgusting as some of the stuff on the web is, when they start censoring sites, who decides what is hate speech or not?

2 posted on 03/11/2006 8:36:21 PM PST by technomage (NEVER underestimate the depths to which liberals will stoop for power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash
I think this is one of the reasons FreeDominion.ca is hosted on a website in the US. There really isn't free speach in Canada.
3 posted on 03/11/2006 8:37:16 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash
the Canadian Human Rights Commission

There's a misnomer if there ever was one. I guess freedom of speech is not a human right but freedom from ever being offended is.

4 posted on 03/11/2006 8:39:10 PM PST by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash
Who says what is 'hate'? Can we ban the NYT and the 'Bush haters'?

Better to have a right to free discourse than someone arbitrarily deciding what is OK.

5 posted on 03/11/2006 8:43:10 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Watch them try to get the "World Court" to claim jurisdiction and pursue any originating website in any country.


6 posted on 03/11/2006 8:46:21 PM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash

Canada is a very scary country.


7 posted on 03/11/2006 8:46:43 PM PST by Krankor (T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash
This just opened a can of worms. Canada is ripe for takeover, defenseless, cowardly, capitulating....
8 posted on 03/11/2006 8:46:44 PM PST by Dallas59 (ALLAH DOES NOT EXIST - MOHAMMED LIED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash
James Scott Richardson was fined $1,000 for several Internet postings, including one calling for attacks on Jewish and Muslim agencies

At least he was fair and balanced.

9 posted on 03/11/2006 8:48:59 PM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash
For the first time in Canada...


Isn't that the country that liberals always want to flock to?
11 posted on 03/11/2006 9:00:34 PM PST by P-40 (http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash
The ruling shows that Canadians have no tolerance for hate

Monette Mailett. Human Rights Commissioner.

Hatred is alive and well in Canada. In any case, hate is almost as likely an emotion as love. This given certain conditions.

The Peter Libra designation of "allowed hatred" follows.

1. The avowed French-Canadian separatist hatred for the "Anglos".

2. The stated hatreds on some Southern Ontario campus, for the State of Israel. (see Daniel Pipes).

3. The unbridled hatred of constituted law enforcement by certain "minorities". (see Toronto Star,include the Dudley George enquiry).

4.The utter contempt and hatred for George W. Bush.(hello sweet Caroline)

I could go on. Still, give sweet Monette credit. Sounds like her forbears did the can-can in gay Paree. She picked on the obvious target. Safe as houses, eh Monette?

12 posted on 03/11/2006 9:21:07 PM PST by Peter Libra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash


Is this another one of those lefty free speech things?


14 posted on 03/11/2006 10:08:29 PM PST by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash

"Hate" is used as a means of controlling speech. Defining something as "hate" is an excuse to take away freedom. "Hate Crimes" laws are Soviet laws and totally un-American. "Human Rights Commissions" in Canada are one reason we sometimes have to call that country the "Peoples Republic of Canada."


17 posted on 03/12/2006 12:31:05 AM PST by Nextrush (The Chris Matthews Band: "I get high..I get high...I get high..McCain.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash

Does this mean that the Toronto Star is going out of business?


18 posted on 03/12/2006 1:31:28 AM PST by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash

What were the offending messages? Without the precise quotes, it is impossible to resolve an informed opinion on this particular case.


19 posted on 03/12/2006 1:34:04 AM PST by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash
For the first time in Canada, an Internet service provider has been found guilty and fined for hosting websites that spread hate messages against blacks, Jews and Muslims.

I guess web sites that spread hate against white Christians are still OK with the Canadian authorities.

21 posted on 03/12/2006 1:41:53 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash
A Human Rights ruling says Internet servers are as liable as their clients for hate material.

I guess if a stationary store sells paper to someone that then writes 'hate' mail with it, they are in big trouble.

22 posted on 03/12/2006 2:44:59 AM PST by Northern Alliance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash

Thoughtcrime doubleplusungood.


23 posted on 03/12/2006 2:47:24 AM PST by GodBlessRonaldReagan (Count Petofi will not be denied!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson