Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/10/2006 2:06:16 PM PST by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: syriacus

What? But, but, but ... there are absolutely no American companies that can do this sort of thing. None whatsoever. I was repeatedly assured of this "fact" by supporters of the DP World deal, so this just can't be true.


2 posted on 03/10/2006 2:08:34 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: syriacus
Some said Maher Terminals, which already operates in the Port of New York/New Jersey, might buy P&O's interests there. Other candidates include Oakland-based Marine Terminals Corp. and Seattle-based Stevedoring Services of America.

Stevedoring Services of America runs 49% of a terminal at the Port of Long Beach.

A Red Chinese government company runs 51% of that terminal in the Port of Long Beach

The Red Chinese Company (COSCO) is considered to be an arm of the Chinese military.

COSCO is the second largest (container?) shipping company in the world and has been involved in smuggling arms into the US, shipping arms to Cuba, and transporting sophisticated weaponry components to Pakistan in 1998.

Clinton's special treatment of the Chinese government's shipping company, COSCO, didn't hurt him or Hillary, even though a COSCO ship was used to smuggle weapons into the US and there was enough of a Clinton-Beijing connection to be named "Chinagate."

* COSCO got guarantees for loans for ships built in Mobile Alabama
* The Clinton Administration allowed COSCO's ships access to our most sensitive ports with one day's notice rather than the usual four
* COSCO nearly got a Clinton-arranged lease on the Long Beach Navy Base
* COSCO currently runs at least one terminal, in the Port of Long Beach.

Aside from the perks Clinton arranged for COSCO, Clinton was able to convince folks that it was in "our national interest" for him to guarantee a loan for a Chinese nuclear plant that supplied power for building their war ships.

15 posted on 03/10/2006 2:28:59 PM PST by syriacus (The stench of hypocrisy hangs heavy. Beijing smugglers can run our terminals, but Dubai can't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: syriacus

I knew there were a few American companies fully capable of operating a port terminals.

Stop apologizing for bureaucratic idiots at the Treasury Dept. and for this administration's incompetence.

That ought to set off the Bushbots.


21 posted on 03/10/2006 2:37:09 PM PST by 308MBR ("Ah fell in ta a bhurnin' ring o' far")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: syriacus
``We think we are one of the companies [who could buy it]. We have been in the business for 70 years. We could do it.''

One thing was learned; Don't partner with Eller & Co. I think that Eller is looking for a fire sale deal.

22 posted on 03/10/2006 2:37:21 PM PST by Mike Darancette (In the Land of the Blind the one-eyed man is king.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: syriacus

Maybe Judge Greer is moving on up.


38 posted on 03/10/2006 2:58:34 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: syriacus
Rep. Jerry Lewis, R-Calif., the chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, said he didn't intend to remove the ports provision from an emergency spending bill for hurricane relief and the war in Iraq.

Is this guy some sort of comedian?

42 posted on 03/10/2006 3:02:47 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: syriacus

Whoever has the funding themselves or a credit line of $7 billion is welcome to ante up.


66 posted on 03/10/2006 4:06:57 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: syriacus

Now, it wouldn't surprise me if the Haji's really try to send something thru a port.


78 posted on 03/10/2006 4:30:10 PM PST by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: syriacus

A young woman who is working for a real estate development corp that is doing business with Dubai, told me that Dubai was going to pull out of the port deal and turn it over to a US company which is actually controlled by Dubai. Maybe this is it.


106 posted on 03/10/2006 5:19:45 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: syriacus

ITS THE FLOR-RI-DA TRUCKING Co.SCHUMER/ELLER Inc.


113 posted on 03/12/2006 3:08:36 AM PST by jerryem (BUY HINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson