Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush: Port Deal Collapse Sends Bad Message
Associated Press ^ | March 10, 2006 | LIZ SIDOTI, Associated Press Writer

Posted on 03/10/2006 8:26:48 AM PST by indcons

President Bush said Friday he was troubled by the political storm that forced the reversal of a deal allowing a company in Dubai to take over take over operations of six American ports, saying it sent a bad message to U.S. allies in the Middle East.

Bush said the United States needs moderate allies in the Arab world, like the United Arab Emirates, to win the global war on terrorism.

The president said he had been satisfied that security would be sound at the ports if the Dubai deal had taken effect. "Nevertheless, Congress was still very much opposed to it," Bush said. He made his remarks to a conference of the National Newspaper Association, which represents owners, publishers and editors of community newspapers.

"I'm concerned about a broader message this issue could send to our friends and allies around the world, particularly in the Middle East," the president said. "In order to win the war on terror we have got to strengthen our friendships and relationships with moderate Arab countries in the Middle East."

"UAE is a committed ally in the war on terror," Bush added. "They are a key partner for our military in a critical region, and outside of our own country, Dubai services more of our military, military ships, than any country in the world.

"They're sharing intelligence so we can hunt down the terrorists," Bush added. "They helped us shut down a world wide proliferation network run by A.Q. Khan" — the Pakistani scientist who sold nuclear technology to Iran, North Korea and Libya, he said.

"UAE is a valued and strategic partner," he said. "I'm committed to strengthening our relationship with the UAE."

After a storm of protest in the Republican-controlled Congress, DP World announced Thursday that it would transfer six U.S. port operations to a U.S. entity. The moved spared Bush from a veto showdown with GOP lawmakers. Yet the larger issue highlighted by the DP world controversy — U.S. port security — shows no signs of going away.

"The problem of the political moment has passed, but the problem of adequate port security still looms large," Sen. Lindsey Graham (news, bio, voting record), R-S.C., said.

Republicans and Democrats alike welcomed DP World's decision to give up its aspirations to manage significant operations at the six ports, but they warned that the move doesn't negate the urgent need for broad legislation aimed at protecting America's ports.

"I'm sure that the decision by DP World was a difficult decision to hand over port operations that they had purchased from another company," Bush said.

"There are gaping holes in cargo and port security that need to be plugged," Sen. Patty Murray (news, bio, voting record), D-Wash., said.

The Bush administration also announced Friday that free trade talks with the United Arab Emirates were being postponed.

The talks, which were supposed to begin Monday, were postponed because both sides need more time to prepare, according to an announcement from the office of U.S. Trade Representative Rob Portman (news, bio, voting record). USTR spokeswoman Neena Moorjani refused to say whether the postponement was related to the controversy over the port operations.

Legislation on the issue has piled up in both the House and the Senate in the weeks since the flap over DP World erupted and divided Bush from the Republican-led Congress.

Before the United Arab Emirates-based company's announcement, the House and Senate appeared all but certain to block DP World's U.S. plan despite Bush's veto threats — a message that GOP congressional leaders delivered personally to the White House.

Facing a disapproving public in an election year, a House committee overwhelmingly voted against the plan Wednesday. And House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., and Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., warned the president in a private meeting Thursday that the Senate inevitably would follow suit.

Within hours, Sen. John Warner (news, bio, voting record), R-Va., one of the few members of Congress to back the administration's position on the issue, went to the Senate floor to read a statement from the company.

"DP World will transfer fully the U.S. operations ... to a United States entity," H. Edward Bilkey, the company's top executive, said in the statement. It was unclear which American business might get the port operations.

The White House expressed satisfaction with the company's decision.

"It does provide a way forward and resolve the matter," said Scott McClellan, the White House press secretary "We have a strong relationship with the UAE and a good partnership in the global war on terrorism, and I think their decision reflects the importance of our broader relationship."

The company's decision gives the president an out. He now doesn't have to back down from his staunch support of the company or further divide his party on a terrorism-related issue with a veto.

It was unclear how the company would manage its planned divestiture, and Bilkey's statement said its announcement was "based on an understanding that DP World will not suffer economic loss."

"This should make the issue go away," Frist said.

Even critics of the deal expressed cautious optimism that DP World's move would quell the controversy surrounding that company's plan to take over some U.S. terminal leases held by the London-based company it was purchasing.

"The devil is in the details," Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said, echoing sentiments expressed by other lawmakers.

DP World on Thursday finalized its $6.8 billion purchase of Peninsular & Oriental Steam Navigation Co., the British company that through a U.S. subsidiary runs important port operations in New York, New Jersey, Baltimore, New Orleans, Miami and Philadelphia. It also plays a lesser role in dockside activities at 16 other American ports.

The plan was disclosed last month, setting off a political firestorm in the United States even though the company's U.S. operations were only a small part of the global transaction.

Republicans were furious that they learned of it from news reports instead of from the Bush administration. They cited concerns over a company run by a foreign government overseeing operations at U.S. ports already deemed vulnerable to terrorist attacks.

Democrats also pledged to halt the takeover and clamored for a vote in the Senate. They sought political advantage from the issue by trying to narrow a polling gap with the GOP on issues of national security.

Senate Republicans initially tried to fend off a vote, and the administration agreed to a 45-day review of the transaction. That strategy collapsed Wednesday with the 62-2 vote in the House Appropriations Committee to thwart the sale.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911; 911sendsbadmessage; alwaysmadatsomething; appeasemuslims; boohoo; buffoonsincongress; callthewaaaambulance; chineseportcontrolok; congressionalidjits; crymeariver; dontcrydhimmis; donttrustislamists; dpw; dubai; dubaidubya; dupeddummies; fridaysillinessday; giveuprinos; goawayrinos; inbushwetrust; insultsdidntwork; justanotherday; muslims; muslimsaremadnoway; neverhappy; pcbushbots; port; ports; redstatearabstreet; rightwingracecard; sentbadmessageon910; sidewithtaiban; stopdubaitalk; stupiditysendsbadmsg; thankgodwesaidno; uae; unccarcrash; waahhwaahhwaahh; wemarchlikebush; wknowsbesthere; wotsetback
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 341 next last
To: zook
"DP World will transfer fully the U.S. operations ... to a United States entity," H. Edward Bilkey, the company's top executive, said in the statement. It was unclear which American business might get the port operations."

They are not selling these leases to an domestic American corporation. They will set up an American holding company and *transfer* these operations to that holding company. At the end of the day DPW will ultimately be in control of these terminals.

161 posted on 03/10/2006 9:46:23 AM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

America's word and the WOT lost. Get used to it.


162 posted on 03/10/2006 9:46:37 AM PST by prairiebreeze (The Old Media: today's carnival barkers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub

Thanks...The most refreshing post of the entire thread.


163 posted on 03/10/2006 9:46:38 AM PST by jazusamo (:Gregory was riled while Hume smiled:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: DCPatriot
And why in the hell didn't President Bush call a press conference to make these statements BEFORE it was too late?

Uhhh......he was scheduled to make this talk and IF CONGRESS would have KEPT IT's word and used the 45 days to investigate the DPW deal, he would have......SEVERAL TIMES!!!

Don't you find it strange that Schmucky et al, and the cowardly GOP, DID NOTHING BUT CRITICIZE the POTUS for "RUSHING" into this deal with NO INVESTIGATION, yet when GIVEN 45 days to EDUCATE THEMSELVES, they opted to act in a visceral manner?

164 posted on 03/10/2006 9:46:45 AM PST by PISANO (We will not tire......We will not falter.......We will NOT FAIL!!! .........GW Bush [Oct 2001])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

This was not a security business. It was operation of a port terminal.


165 posted on 03/10/2006 9:48:01 AM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All

Bill Clinton helped Dubai on ports deal

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1588266/posts
Financial Times (FT.com) ^ | March 1 2006 23:50 | Stephanie Kirchgaessner

Bill Clinton, former US president, advised top officials from Dubai two weeks ago
on how to address growing US concerns over the acquisition of five US container terminals by DP World.
It came even as his wife, Senator Hillary Clinton, was leading efforts to derail the deal.


166 posted on 03/10/2006 9:48:17 AM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (It's ALWAYS a great day to be a Conservative Independent Voter AND a Viet Nam Vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: bigeasy_70118
That's why it pays to think for yourself and not drink the Kool-Aid.

Well if you are not drinking from someone's tit why accuse others of the same ?

It's childish and insulting.

167 posted on 03/10/2006 9:48:48 AM PST by Earthdweller ("West to Islam" Cake. Butter your liberals, slowly cook France, stir in Europe then watch it rise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: PISANO
Don't you find it strange that Schmucky et al, and the cowardly GOP, DID NOTHING BUT CRITICIZE the POTUS for "RUSHING" into this deal with NO INVESTIGATION, yet when GIVEN 45 days to EDUCATE THEMSELVES, they opted to act in a visceral manner?

Please. You ask too much of emotional, knee-jerking Bush-bashers.

168 posted on 03/10/2006 9:48:50 AM PST by prairiebreeze (The Old Media: today's carnival barkers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: PISANO
I don't think you read the Presidents words, but then again gut instinct and visceral reaction is what MOVED this entire fiasco, not contemplative thought and investigation.

Actually, I think parsing words, making self justifying rationalizations and defending the indefensible escalated this fiasco.

169 posted on 03/10/2006 9:48:55 AM PST by bigeasy_70118
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Coop
Details such as those wouldn't concern any reasonable person when viewed in the context of proper vetting

I wonder if some more concern might begin if more news like this that was in the article comes out.

The Bush administration also announced Friday that free trade talks with the United Arab Emirates were being postponed.

The talks, which were supposed to begin Monday, were postponed because both sides need more time to prepare, according to an announcement from the office of U.S. Trade Representative Rob Portman (news, bio, voting record). USTR spokeswoman Neena Moorjani refused to say whether the postponement was related to the controversy over the port operations.

170 posted on 03/10/2006 9:49:19 AM PST by imaketypos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: trubluolyguy
Why is it necessary to officially recognize Israel? They support the notion that Israel has a right to exist.

I believe that they have a policy of religious toleration which is far more lenient than most Middle Eastern countries.

171 posted on 03/10/2006 9:51:09 AM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Israel supported this deal. Horrors!


172 posted on 03/10/2006 9:52:05 AM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Coop

The President didn't try to sell the American people on the deal. He only issued a veto threat to congress. There was no leadership. Hopefully he's learned from this and realize he no longer has a blank check from the GOP in congress nor a large portion of the GOP base. But the President is a grown-up and he'll get over it.


173 posted on 03/10/2006 9:53:25 AM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller
Well if you are not drinking from someone's tit why accuse others of the same ? It's childish and insulting.

I never thought I would see the verbal embodiement of the pot calling the kettle black. You accuse me of being a Schumer groupie, as if I agree with him on everything and then tell me I am a childish and insulting? Show me one post on this forum where you disagree with Bush on something.

174 posted on 03/10/2006 9:53:27 AM PST by bigeasy_70118
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Hannity decries the secretive nature of the CFIUS process and the lack of Congressional oversight. But he overlooks the fact that Congress made this a secretive process.


175 posted on 03/10/2006 9:54:25 AM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: nightdriver

That's what some people on the Talking Heads shows on cable were indicating (last night)


176 posted on 03/10/2006 9:55:53 AM PST by indcons (The MSM - Mainstream Slime Merchants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: indcons
Maybe. But the White House fumbled the ports deal badly. GOP members in Congress are claiming they did not have a clue until they woke up and read the morning papers. GWB needs to wake up and smell the coffee. About 67% of Americans want border security improved! Ports are the water entry to the U.S. In the meantime, our land borders stand wide open for illegal immigrants and terrorists disguised as Mexicans. Get a grip on reality! Lock down the F&^*&@# borders now!
177 posted on 03/10/2006 9:55:59 AM PST by ex-Texan (Matthew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

condescend, much?


178 posted on 03/10/2006 9:57:21 AM PST by jw777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: yellowdoghunter

I traveled to Florida for a week to get him re-elected yet am told I voted for Kerry and are a DU'er. Go Figure.


179 posted on 03/10/2006 9:58:51 AM PST by chris1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: sully777

Please see my # 171.


180 posted on 03/10/2006 9:59:33 AM PST by ex-Texan (Matthew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 341 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson