Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arab ally senses Bush no longer has control in Washington
Financial Times ^ | March 9, 2006 | Edward Alden and Holly Yeager

Posted on 03/09/2006 2:48:04 PM PST by West Coast Conservative

The decision by the United Arab Emirates on Thursday to order state-controlled Dubai Ports World to end its control over US port facilities marks the lowest point yet in the relationship between President George W. Bush and the Republican-controlled Congress.

Mr Bush had warned repeatedly that blocking the deal would send a dangerously discriminatory message to the world. He threatened repeatedly to veto any congressional legislation.

But with his public approval ratings at record lows and his Republican party abandoning him, one of the US’s closest allies in the Arab world concluded that he was no longer in control in Washington.

The decision by Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al- Maktoum, the ruler of Dubai, is likely to avert the political backlash that hit Washington last month and may prevent any further damage to diplomatic and security relations between the countries. But it underscored that Mr Bush, who still has nearly three years to go in his second term, has become perilously weak.

Dennis Hastert, the Republican speaker of the House and one of Mr Bush’s most loyal backers in Congress, emerged from a White House meeting on Thursday morning and signalled that he could not hold back the opposition to the deal. “We want to protect the American people and we will continue to do that,” he said.

“There’s a Republican initiative right now that says, ‘Get us the hell out of here’,” said Frank Lautenberg, a Republican senator from the port state of New Jersey.

The acquisition of five US port terminals by an Arab company became an unlikely target for an outpouring of American anger and fear. While administration officials and port security experts insisted there were no security concerns raised by the transfer of port facilities from a British company to a Dubai company, members of Congress said they were flooded with calls and letters from ordinary Americans angered by the deal.

The White House promise to reopen a national security investigation into the deal, together with a concerted public relations effort by DP World, seemed only to deepen the anger.

More than four years after the September 11 attacks, it brought together a toxic combination of anxieties over America’s place in the world. Traditional protectionists, worried by foreign acquisitions of US assets and the outsourcing of jobs to distant and little-understood countries, lined up alongside security hawks who warned that even a close Arab ally such as the UAE was vulnerable to terrorist infiltration.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2006election; ally; almaktoum; bush; bush43; bushnotdictator; congress; dpworld; dubai; gop; house; ports; readconstitution; republican; senate; term2; terrorism; tyrantsrants; uae; uaeranting; whatpoliticalcapital
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 301-314 next last
To: RFT1

"Limbaugh isint what he once was 12 years ago, he now seems to be little more than a pawn, rather than someone about principle.
"

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm...... we will see. I believe he is about principle, but realizes that radio is 'entertainment' and 'information'. All work makes Johnny a dull boy. One must cater to some type of format, screen and prepare for callers. One must have a hook that keeps listeners.

There are concessions in life for most everyone.
Can you throw stones so easily, my friend?


81 posted on 03/09/2006 4:18:36 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (and miles to go before I sleep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
While administration officials and port security experts insisted there were no security concerns raised by the transfer of port facilities.

An understandable mistatement of the actual statements based on the weasel words employed by those who testified.

Had to parse the damn things like we used to parse the Xlintons. And what was left was highly dubious. Kenneth Timmerman came to a similar assessment.

82 posted on 03/09/2006 4:20:30 PM PST by Paul Ross (Hitting bullets with bullets successfully for 35 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adorno
If they have to come back to the people for every or most decisions

They don't. And since they don't, and since I never said they do, I won't bother reading on. I said they must give us our due, and they must.

83 posted on 03/09/2006 4:20:56 PM PST by Huck (space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000
Is an undisciplined Republican Congress the lesser of two evils?

I used to think so. I have been proven wrong.

84 posted on 03/09/2006 4:21:34 PM PST by surely_you_jest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
What is comical is that if a Dem were Pres, the media would have given the rightwing no attention, or belittled their concerns.

The only reason the "people" think they have won, is because the MSM wanted it that way.
85 posted on 03/09/2006 4:21:56 PM PST by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Sounds more like Dubai did Bush a favor pulling back from the deal. It takes some heat off W that way.


86 posted on 03/09/2006 4:22:03 PM PST by satchmodog9 (Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WatchingInAmazement

Send it to Rush. I'm sure he'll read it on his show. /s


87 posted on 03/09/2006 4:23:26 PM PST by Huck (space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000
Is an undisciplined Republican Congress the lesser of two evils? Some Bush critics blame Bush for this. It isn't his fault.

He could have been busy vetoing spending bills, and getting the UAE to do it this way...from the get-go. The issue couldn't have come up in the first place. He would have been immensely better off.

But put that aside.

We need to avoid public recriminations, and in particular in that regard, we need to avoid the administration appearing to sulk.

Instead, the President needs to go on television and take ownership of the fix, and thank Congress for its helpful oversight proving the wisdom of our Founder's in setting up our Government this way, conspicuously praising the conservative stalwarts who hung tough and ultimately persuaded him and made the case apparent to him that there were unsuspected issues that needed better care in these transactions. They should be on the White House lawn with him for the photo ops. He should ask them then to see about fixing the CFIUS process to better guarantee security issues are considered.

And then he should crow. Yes. You heard me, crow.

He should praise the UAE for showing that its assurances were not mere form, but substantive, that we have a real ally here, one who only wants to help us, and do business with us, and help our security, and their willingess to 'go the extra mile' and accept an autonomous subsidiary structure proves that.

This is a Win-Win if he does it right. The UAE is lauded, saving face, the President recovers appearing presidential, and is shown being a dynamic force for successful resolution, not an opponent of security...and the Conservatives in Congress get to share in the victory lap. Conspicuously avoided would be any mention of the democrats, or even a HINT of the Arabophobia-condemnation that was previously fired off in a mistaken attempt to triangulate the issue.

88 posted on 03/09/2006 4:37:32 PM PST by Paul Ross (Hitting bullets with bullets successfully for 35 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse

he he


89 posted on 03/09/2006 4:37:59 PM PST by babygene (Viable after 87 trimesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: ConsentofGoverned

<< .... if a sucker is born every minute, what are the voters? >>

Almost to a man?

Superciliously, sanctimoniously and self-righteously self-serving supporters of selected scores of standover and shakedown shuckers and jiving, justifying and rationalizing regiments of ratbag RICO-racketeering robbers. [AKA "politicians]


90 posted on 03/09/2006 4:41:27 PM PST by Brian Allen (How arrogant are we to believe our career political-power-lusting lumpen somehow superior to theirs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Huck
They don't. And since they don't, and since I never said they do, I won't bother reading on. I said they must give us our due, and they must.

In the case of the DPW case, they were looking at the polls and made a cowardly and unprincipled decision. That's not what leaders do. Leaders sometines have to make unpopular decisions. Polls or not.

And, elected leaders give you your due when they make decisions on your behalf because you elected them to do so. The electorate doesn't get to call the shots every time a new decision needs to be made. The voters get their due (or revenge) when they vote.
91 posted on 03/09/2006 4:43:42 PM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

That was a megaton of hurdles you had to ropa dope. Nice try but no cigar.

The citizens of America won one today...we the people do have a say and the President is not a king.


92 posted on 03/09/2006 4:46:35 PM PST by takenoprisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: adorno

Then again, sometimes the public is right.


93 posted on 03/09/2006 4:46:54 PM PST by Huck (space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: adorno
In the case of the DPW case, they were looking at the polls and made a cowardly and unprincipled decision.

Or maybe not. Maybe they were looking at the plethora of weasel words in the claims made by the administration cabinet officers and the 'expert' talking points.

In particular those of the Coast Guard put every Xlinton-wise conservative on edge as they almost automatically parsed those sentances...abstracting the worthless caveats and the words they neutralized...and concluded what was left was extremely dubious. And everything else was unsubstantiated overstatement and thin reassurances.

Kenneth Timmerman came to a similar conclusion as the leading republicans.

94 posted on 03/09/2006 4:49:57 PM PST by Paul Ross (Hitting bullets with bullets successfully for 35 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT; adorno; Lekker 1

Bush comes out stronger ? What color is the sky in your world ?

The American people do not trust Arabs. Period. And they don't want to either. Period. There was no way this could ever be sold.

And sold is the operative term. The UAE thought it had greased the right people and therefore it would sail through. They were shocked by this democratic consent of the governed thing. They were disgusted at the weakness of a ruler who did not respond by filling bags with severed heads as they would have. That these low born American vermin should dare to talk back to the Emir has insulted them.

They think every American has his price. They guessed wrong.


95 posted on 03/09/2006 4:54:32 PM PST by Sam the Sham (A conservative party tough on illegal immigration could carry California in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

<< Arab ally senses Bush no longer has control in Washington >>

What wishful thinking rubbish.

The writers clearly don't have a clue about the office of president in America's Constitutional Republican government.

Its my bet the passionately anonymous President Bush simply made a call and asked his Dubai friends - and America's - to sell their Dubai company to their American company.

And then, to crown that, he timed his signing of the Patriot Act to absolutely seal his ownership of the delusionally fantasized, "win," the "demagoguing "Democrats" and their cravenly cowardly brown nosing "republican" shyster shills and bag carriers were set to "celebrate."

Way to go, Mr President!


96 posted on 03/09/2006 4:55:15 PM PST by Brian Allen (How arrogant are we to believe our career political-power-lusting lumpen somehow superior to theirs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Then again, sometimes the public is right.

Keyword: "sometimes"

Now, tell me, what percentage of "the public" do you think is smart enough or informed enough to know what the DPW deal was about?
97 posted on 03/09/2006 4:57:31 PM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: adorno

Roughly the same percentage that bothers to write or call their representatives.


98 posted on 03/09/2006 4:59:20 PM PST by Huck (space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
I know "conservatives" like to tout "intellectual/reasoned/logical" arguments over "emotional" ones, but both have value and both have their place.

"Knee jerk" reactions refer to what is known in medicine as Deep Tendon Reflexes. As reflexes, they are a completely separate survival strategy from logic, and a much older, basic, and often more helpful response. Our "gut feelings" and our "animal instincts" and our "primitive reflexes" are very salient survival tools, honed and evolved (if you're an evolutionist) over a much longer span of time than the logic of our neocortex. They are ignored only at great peril. Most people know this, and I think this is the basis for the reaction of the vast majority to this port deal. I don't think it is a matter of hate, but a matter of fear, and I don't think people are wrong for listening to their gut on this one. Intellectual, logical arguments will simply take a back seat in this kind of issue unless they are overwhelmingly persuasive, which the arguments in this case clearly are not.

Interesting layman's read discussing these sorts of things is a recent book called, appropriately, "Deep Survival" by some fellow named Gonzales. I believe you might have a better understanding of our reaction and its value if you read this book.
99 posted on 03/09/2006 5:05:13 PM PST by dagogo redux (I never met a Dem yet who didn't understand a slap in the face, or a slug from a 45)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dagogo redux; adorno; MNJohnnie; Echo Talon; Stellar Dendrite; Junior_G
"Knee jerk" reactions refer to what is known in medicine as Deep Tendon Reflexes. As reflexes, they are a completely separate survival strategy from logic, and a much older, basic, and often more helpful response. Our "gut feelings" and our "animal instincts" and our "primitive reflexes" are very salient survival tools, honed and evolved (if you're an evolutionist) over a much longer span of time than the logic of our neocortex. They are ignored only at great peril. Most people know this, and I think this is the basis for the reaction of the vast majority to this port deal. I don't think it is a matter of hate, but a matter of fear, and I don't think people are wrong for listening to their gut on this one. Intellectual, logical arguments will simply take a back seat in this kind of issue unless they are overwhelmingly persuasive, which the arguments in this case clearly are not.

What a superb post ! The gut instinct of the American people smelled danger. It saw public risk for private gain. It smelled a greased insider deal. It smelled that the fix was in. And in life your gut instincts are generally right.

100 posted on 03/09/2006 5:13:42 PM PST by Sam the Sham (A conservative party tough on illegal immigration could carry California in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 301-314 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson