Skip to comments.
Dubai threat to hit back (UAE Threatens Against Boeing and US Bases Support)
The Hill.com ^
| March 9, 2006
| Roxana Tiron
Posted on 03/09/2006 9:02:17 AM PST by prairiebreeze
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,201-2,220, 2,221-2,240, 2,241-2,260 ... 2,441 next last
To: jess35
2,221
posted on
03/10/2006 1:51:09 AM PST
by
endthematrix
(None dare call it ISLAMOFACISM!)
To: Do not dub me shapka broham
Yes, I'm satisfied you're scrambling in vain trying to cover up your erroneous assertion that Arab Americans are blowing stuff up and killing infidels.
Why not just admit you were trying to paint all arab Americans as terrorists?
To: Do not dub me shapka broham
MUSLIMS, but not all Muslims are ARABS and the blind sheik is NOT an AMERICAN CITIZEN, hence he can NOT be an "ARAB AMERICAN". And though he masterminded the first WTC bombing, as well as the murder of Meir Kahani, he, himself didn't do either.
To: endthematrix
You're the one who is confused. Did you bother to read the original accusation....or are you just jumping on the bandwagon without any thought?
To: endthematrix
Dont' forget Al-Furqa, which has conducted more terrorist attacks within U.S. territory than any other single Muslim-American organization.
2,225
posted on
03/10/2006 1:54:48 AM PST
by
Do not dub me shapka broham
("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
To: nopardons
You got 'em on the ropes! Give 'em the "they All don't want to kill us...just some of them" ROP knock out punch!
2,226
posted on
03/10/2006 1:56:41 AM PST
by
endthematrix
(None dare call it ISLAMOFACISM!)
To: Do not dub me shapka broham
It would help your argument, if you didn't completely mistake things.
Since Lynn Stewart was the LAWYER, for the blind sheik and said sheik WAS/IS in jail, HE was hardly the "letter carrier" for Lynn Stewart!
FYI...Egyptians don't consider themselves to be ARABS and nobody else does either.
To: nopardons; jess35; endthematrix
I didn't use the blind sheik as an illustration-although I find it odd that you two refuse to specify what constitutes an Arab-American, does he have to be born on U.S. soil, have gained permanent residency, what precisely are the criteria being used-but the 100+ unindicted co-conspirators during the 1st WTC bombing trial, all of whom were Muslims, almost all of them Arabs, and most being Americans of one stripe or another.
2,228
posted on
03/10/2006 1:57:53 AM PST
by
Do not dub me shapka broham
("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
To: endthematrix
HUNH?
I'm asking for PRCISE language to be used. You have a problem with that, do you?
To: nopardons
No, he was a letter carrier-employed by the US Post Office, if I'm not mistaken-and a legal aid for Lynne Stewert.
Basically deceptive covers used by him as he served as an intermediary between Muslim terrorists here and ones overseas.
2,230
posted on
03/10/2006 2:01:16 AM PST
by
Do not dub me shapka broham
("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
To: Do not dub me shapka broham
Oh yes, you most assuredly DID use the blind sheik. Go read your posts.
You kept on writing ARAB AMERICANS. That is incorrect. Not all Muslims are ARABS!
And hyphenated Americans are disgusting...but I digress....
If you aren't a citizen of America, you aren't an AMERICAN!
If you don't write coherently, your positions become null and void.
To: Do not dub me shapka broham
Islamists are bound through death, not by residency.
2,232
posted on
03/10/2006 2:03:49 AM PST
by
endthematrix
(None dare call it ISLAMOFACISM!)
To: Do not dub me shapka broham
You have your story all mixed up.
The N.Y. Post is on line and they DO have an archive. I suggest that you go read the stories about this.
To: nopardons
No. The problem is your absence and waiting while other posts were made and then pouncing to attempt to denigrate.
2,234
posted on
03/10/2006 2:13:19 AM PST
by
endthematrix
(None dare call it ISLAMOFACISM!)
To: endthematrix
That's patently ridiculous. I've been on and off this thread since it began.
And FWIW, there is NO rule here, that states that one must continuously be on one thread, from start to finish, in order to be relevant. But since you are incapable of any other reply, you made that silly one up. Well, it is off topic, irrelevant, and silly to boot.
To: nopardons; endthematrix
How does citizenship make someone an American, if they don't agree to abide by our laws, customs, and rituals?
My definition of what an Arab-American-and I use the term Arab and Muslim synonymously since Zogby, the person who started this dispute, is protecting Arab-MUSLIMS alone-is just as valid-and more accurate-than yours.
If you're a true Muslim, then you do not ever pledge your fealty to a man-made state.
You bow only to Allah and Mohammed.
And whether you were born in Indiana, subsequent to which your family flew overseas, only to return in order to wreak destruction upon your native land, or have lived in this country your entire life, or for that matter, are a recently naturalized citizen, you can not have dual loyalties.
You can either be devout Muslim, or be a patriotic American.
The two are mutually exclusive.
2,236
posted on
03/10/2006 2:20:55 AM PST
by
Do not dub me shapka broham
("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
To: Do not dub me shapka broham; nopardons
I agree. And it was nopardons' obvious failure of support (I didn't make it up. I was giving you credit for being intelligent) and the subsequent failure of not discrediting the "Arab-American" by using "precise language." It's sly, ugly and pure nopardons.
2,237
posted on
03/10/2006 2:29:50 AM PST
by
endthematrix
(None dare call it ISLAMOFACISM!)
To: BigSkyFreeper
And just how do you know what Schumer thinks? Again, I am not really concerned about the security issue. I am concerned about letting a country who refuses to acknowledge Israel to operate our ports. And it looks like I don't have to worry for awhile anyway.
To: Antoninus
What an intelligent reply! We need more of that on FR.
To: AmeriBrit
I know the ports weren't being sold. What is your point?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,201-2,220, 2,221-2,240, 2,241-2,260 ... 2,441 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson