Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/09/2006 3:58:26 AM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: The Foolkiller; Just another Joe; Madame Dufarge; Cantiloper; metesky; kattracks; Judith Anne; ...

2 posted on 03/09/2006 3:58:50 AM PST by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
I was thinking of you this morning, SheLion.

On this morning's news there was a story which claimed cigarette sales in the United States is the lowest it's been since 1951. That's when I recalled some of your postings about people who "roll their own" and I wondered just how many people are doing that now and if that had something to do with these numbers.

I did meet some people from German not that long ago and in that group of five, four were making their own cigarettes.
4 posted on 03/09/2006 4:09:31 AM PST by Cagey (You don't pay taxes - they take taxes. ~Chris Rock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
It is my opinion that this has less to do with smoking and more to do with establishing a precedent for pursuing "lost" sales tax revenue from out of state purchases of any kind.

Smokers are an easy starting point as they have been branded as evil and the feeling is the general public will not have sympathy.

For the record,it was three years ago yesterday that I quit smoking.

5 posted on 03/09/2006 4:10:09 AM PST by carlr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
The tobacco companies really need to strike back. One company needs to take the bull by the horns and end distribution in the city of New York or even the State of New York. I know it would be a great loss of sales to that company. If other manufacturers could be persuaded to follow, the money drain on the state would make them howl and lay bare the state's reliance on dirty cigarettes.

The would have to raise taxes on nonsmokers to makeup for the loss from tobacco.

10 posted on 03/09/2006 4:24:41 AM PST by Nomorjer Kinov (If the opposite of "pro" is "con" , what is the opposite of progress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
unfairly cheated of tax revenues.

Nope, fairly cheated.

11 posted on 03/09/2006 4:26:40 AM PST by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
the state and city are unfairly cheated of tax revenues.

This is about as "unfair" as your not telling a mugger who just stole your wallet that you have another couple of hundred hidden in your shoe. One could say that the mugger was unfairly cheated of his revenue too.

13 posted on 03/09/2006 4:32:39 AM PST by from occupied ga (Peace through superior firepower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion

A judge can ban the sale of a legal product?

Did he find that in the Chinese communist constitution or the Nazi Germany laws?


26 posted on 03/09/2006 6:13:19 AM PST by sergeantdave (The business of business is none of the government's business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson