Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jean Schmidt called young Republican activists, "young Hitlers"
The Hill ^ | March 8, 2006 | Jackie Kucinich

Posted on 03/08/2006 8:01:25 PM PST by conservative_2001

As a delegate to the Republican National Convention in 1984, Rep. Jean Schmidt (R-Ohio) expressed her contempt for a future colleague and allegedly likened young Republican activists to Hitler, according to an interview published by the local paper at the time.

While shadowing Schmidt at the convention, The Cincinnati Enquirer reporter initially described Schmidt as a “woman who will speak her mind whenever she pleases.”

Schmidt, who was 32 at the time, provided evidence for this assessment during her time with the reporter, who quoted her taking issue with future Sen. Elizabeth Dole (R-N.C.), who was then President Reagan’s transportation secretary. During her tenure at Transportation, Dole wanted to impose a nationwide drinking age of 21.

“I hate that woman,” she told the reporter. “I just can’t stand her. Anyone who wants to force an increase in the drinking age to 21. … She can send our boys off to fight wars when they’re 17 and 18 but won’t let them drink till they’re 21.”

She added, “That stinks.”

The article also details her “booing” during a Dole appearance at the convention.

A spokeswoman for Dole, chairwoman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, declined to comment for this report.

Barry Bennett, Schmidt’s chief of staff, said, “The conservatives and the moderates didn’t get along very well in the 1980s. You can’t take a remark in the heat of a campaign out of context. That’s not fair.”

Bennett added that Schmidt was a Reagan supporter when the article was written.

Later in the article, while expressing her opinions about young Republican activists, she said, “They look like young Hitlers to me. … They’re so grim and deadly serious about the cause.”

“How are we going to attract mainstream kids to our party, kids who like to have fun and don’t take themselves so seriously?” she asked.

Bennett disputed that Schmidt made the comment, explaining that her twin sister, Jennifer Black, who was also mentioned in the paragraph, made the remark.

When asked to comment about her sister’s supposed remark, Bennett replied, “I don’t work for her sister.”

Michael Harlow, a spokesman for former Rep. Bob McEwen (R-Ohio), who is challenging Schmidt in the May primary, said, “It is disappointing to hear the contempt Mrs. Schmidt holds for Senator Dole, a woman who Bob McEwen and most Americans hold in very high esteem.”

He added: “Also, the hardworking activists she called ‘Hitlers’ were instrumental in our successful efforts to gain the majority for just the second time in 70 years.”

Schmidt defeated McEwen in an 11-candidate primary in July in a special election to fill the seat vacated by former Rep. Rob Portman (R-Ohio), who became the U.S. trade representative.

James P. Urling, chairman of the Cincinnati-based Coalition Opposed to Additional Spending and Taxes (COAST), a group founded by another former Schmidt opponent, Tom Brinkman, said, “Jean Schmidt has a history of nasty barbs aimed at values we all hold dear.”

Schmidt faces a primary in May against McEwen as well as a general election in November. Brinkman has since dubbed Schmidt “Mean Jean” and has called her a “pathological liar.”

Bennett responded by calling Brinkman “the king of outrageous comments” and "a fringe player in politics in Cincinnati."

Schmidt’s unabashed candor became national news and the butt of a joke on "Saturday Night Live" in November. She had made negative remarks about 17th-term Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.) after he called for Bush to withdraw troops from Iraq. Schmidt later withdrew her words.

On Tuesday, Schmidt removed a claim on her website that Reps. Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.) and Steve Chabot (R-Ohio) had endorsed her in the Republican primary this year after Tancredo and Chabot’s office said it was not true.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: 22yearsold; jeanschmidt; mcewen; mediabias; oh2; schmidt; yellowjournalism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last
To: conservative_2001

If it's quoting from a 22-year-old article, it most certainly is gotcha journalism.


81 posted on 03/08/2006 9:59:49 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Dennis' daughter Jackie would be 20 now. It'd be difficult for me to believe that The Hill would have a full-time reporter who isn't yet out of college.


82 posted on 03/08/2006 10:01:56 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: conservative_2001
As if often the problem with Schmidt, even when she's right she makes the point so poorly that she only helps the other side.

Now that is a fair point. The first one you've made. What really makes me suspicious of people like you is that what you are doing is really onanistic. You might do a good job of convincing people in Iowa or Texas or Alaska that she's not good for the people of her Ohio district, but then where are you? FreeRepublic is not the best vehicle for that kind of activism.

83 posted on 03/08/2006 10:07:10 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: everyone

Wouldn't it be nice of Ohio kicked this one to the curb!


84 posted on 03/08/2006 10:10:10 PM PST by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee; Anti-Bubba182; MadelineZapeezda
Shirley MacLaine, the moonbat, is Jackie's godmother.

That should be the late Shirley Maclaine.

85 posted on 03/08/2006 10:27:40 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Did not know she died - you sure?


86 posted on 03/08/2006 10:54:30 PM PST by DennisR (Look around - God is giving you countless observable clues of His existence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: DennisR

I'm sorry. I was mistaken. I must have confused her with another actress.

Here's a link to an article from February.

http://edition.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/Movies/02/21/macleine.reut/


87 posted on 03/08/2006 11:01:55 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

Young Republicans (yours truly included), can be quite hot-headed--not too different in that regard than young democrats in the hotheadedness--though young activists on the left can be considerably worse in showing contempt for others in their party... I'm not shocked that she might have said something like that, but to hold it against her 22 years later is ludicrous and idiotic. Judge her on the merits and facts now, and her record in the house, and on her false claims of being endorsed by Tancredo and Chabot, not on something that happened almost a quarter of a century ago. Heck democrats forgive Byrd for being a klansman, and that is far worse.


88 posted on 03/09/2006 3:06:28 AM PST by Schwaeky ("Truth is not determined by a majority vote." Pope Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
It is obvious that you are fond of congresswoman Jean Schmidt.

Here is my viewpoint, maybe you'll consider it to be valid and not automatically invalid just because I don't care for Jean Schmidt as a legislator. My first dealings with Jean was in 2004 when I helped my state rep. Tom Niehaus run against her for Ohio Senate. It was during this race that I lost my respect for her as a legislator and a politician. First, she used pictures of Tom's grandchildren in a negative ad that was meant to upset Tom's wife (ask me for details). Second, she was in tight with Larry Householder, the corrupt and embattled speaker of the Ohio House, and had Householder come up with several corrupt schemes to get funding (ask for more details). Third, she accused my county board of elections of being corrupt and miscounting ballots just because she did not get more votes out of my county after a required recount. Fourth, she continuously bashed my county GOP throughout the election. What really urked me was that right before she ran for Senate she had voted for Taft's tax increases, yet tried to sell herself as a fiscal conservative!!! So, this was what left the task of Schmidt in my mouth before the Congressional race.

Now to the congressional race. If DeWine had not spent $1 million dollars attacking McEwen and then later Brinkman, Jean would not have been able to squeak her way through to victory. Jean was never the front-runner in that race! And she didn't pull off a surprise victory on purpose. People were disgusted with the attack ads by DeWine and thus splintered the vote even more. So in conclusion, Jean did not have a mandate from the GOP base last primary (maybe the reason she barely won the general). Let's see if she can make it through this primary and then I'll consider her our legitimate candidate. Even so, I won't be helping her out in the general.
89 posted on 03/09/2006 5:09:42 AM PST by LandofGrant (Republicans for decent candidates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: conservative_2001
“woman who will speak her mind whenever she pleases.”

Mind? What mind?
90 posted on 03/09/2006 5:30:56 AM PST by Supernatural (Lay me doon in the caul caul groon, whaur afore monie mair huv gaun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative_2001
...allegedly likened young Republican activists to Hitler...

Later in the article, while expressing her opinions about young Republican activists, she said, “They look like young Hitlers to me. … They’re so grim and deadly serious about the cause.”

It went from "allegedly" to a quote pretty quickly.

Michael Harlow, a spokesman for former Rep. Bob McEwen (R-Ohio), who is challenging Schmidt in the May primary, said, “It is disappointing to hear the contempt Mrs. Schmidt holds for Senator Dole, a woman who Bob McEwen and most Americans hold in very high esteem.”

This has McEwen's fingerprints all over it. Thanks for this post, conservative. A friend has been trying to get me to take some Schmidt bumper stickers, but I've been putting it off. This post has convinced me to support Jean Schmidt.

91 posted on 03/09/2006 5:57:04 AM PST by far sider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schwaeky
her false claims of being endorsed by Tancredo and Chabot

Interesting. Can you link to where the claim was made and where it was refuted?

All that I know about her is that she defeated that duplicitous monster Hackett and that she called Murtha a "coward" on the House floor.

I found an article where Chabot and Schmidt joined together in voting "present" in a resolution honoring the Steelers and an earlier one where Chabot defended Schmidt's Hackett remarks. Searching on Tancredo is problematic.

92 posted on 03/09/2006 6:55:30 AM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
One cannot like Reagan and the Dole's at the same time.

And one cannot like Reagan, then turn around and violate Reagan's 11th commandment.

93 posted on 03/09/2006 6:58:26 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LandofGrant
It should be noted that LandofGrant has posted nearly all anti-Schmidt posts. If this is what the McEwen campaign has been reduced to, I don't know why they bother.
94 posted on 03/09/2006 7:00:42 AM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Is the whole one cannot like Reagan and Dole at same time thing due to the liberterian (small L) view of politics of Reagan and belief in self government, vs. the Dole wing view of socially conservative big government?


As long as it has an R on it, its okay with me...


95 posted on 03/09/2006 8:32:37 AM PST by Schwaeky ("Truth is not determined by a majority vote." Pope Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
She should become a Libertarian.

Awwww, you're just pissed that she smacked down your girl Liddy Dole.

96 posted on 03/09/2006 10:50:51 AM PST by jmc813 (I Thessalonians 5:9-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: LandofGrant

I view Rep. Schmidt solely through the prism of Schmidt vs. McEwen. I only offer her defense when matched against the less-than-distinguished former Congressman and some of the over-the-top and reaching attacks. From what has been explained, her record in the legislature was at worst, not stellar, and at best, perhaps average. The problem is that she has barely been in the Congress long enough to establish an objectionable record (and there have been more than a few individuals who amassed stellar records in state legislatures only to falter in DC, and some with mediocre legislative records who turned out to be a pleasant surprise in DC). If Miss Schmidt had served a full term demonstrating mediocrity and had a strong Conservative and non-flawed opponent, she would be fair game, and I would give considerable attention to the opponent. In this case, it simply is no contest. For whatever flaws Schmidt has, McEwen's more than outweigh them.

My position during the special, to be clear, was that I was solely anti-DeWine (for a time, I actually had forgotten how flawed McEwen was, and gave momentary thought to voicing support for him -- so as long as it was either Brinkman or Schmidt, that would be fine). Do not believe I have a burning passion for Schmidt, as I surely don't have for the mess the OH GOP has gotten itself into, but as long as the equation is Schmidt vs. McEwen, it's a very easy choice. Schmidt wins hands-down.


97 posted on 03/09/2006 1:14:05 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

Not only was she right about the Doles and the drinking age, but I was a young conservative in 1984. I went to see Howard Phillips speak once. After, they had a meeting of the local Young Republicans. I don't know about Hitler, but they were UBER-ICKY! I know what she meant.

I remember the '84 convention too. At what should've been a golden moment for conservatives, I realized that the establishment still dominated the GOP. It was very disappointing.


98 posted on 03/09/2006 1:55:48 PM PST by AlexandriaDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Awwww, you're just pissed

I'm not a Libertarian. That's pretty much their permanent condition.

99 posted on 03/09/2006 7:21:43 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

Where have you been? Schmidt's false claims of endorsements from Chabot and Tancredo are all over the place.

The links below discuss Mean Jean's lies regarding both the Chabot and Tancredo non-endorsements.

http://news.cincinnati.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060308/NEWS01/603080356/-1/CINCI

http://frontier.cincinnati.com/blogs/gov/2006/03/schmidt-chabot-in-endorsement-dispute.asp


100 posted on 03/09/2006 7:23:43 PM PST by conservative_2001 (Defeat Paul Hackett and Jean Schmidt in 2006 - one down, one to go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson