Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: narby
The thirty-one per cent (31%) then have the ID position. Not Darwinism. That sunspots are said to "evolve" (a recent newsreport) does not mean Darwinism. Evolution is a very generic term. And that common general usage -- such as the evolution of sunspots is of course most people sign on to it!

Yet Darwinism, or Darwinistic Evolution is a very specific term. And just about everybody disagrees with it.

132 posted on 03/08/2006 7:48:06 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: bvw
The thirty-one per cent (31%) then have the ID position.

LOL. Yeah, whatever.

134 posted on 03/08/2006 8:03:41 PM PST by narby (Evolution is the new "third rail" in American politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

To: bvw
The thirty-one per cent (31%) then have the ID position. Not Darwinism. That sunspots are said to "evolve" (a recent newsreport) does not mean Darwinism. Evolution is a very generic term. And that common general usage -- such as the evolution of sunspots is of course most people sign on to it!

The gaping hole in your desperate hand-waving is that I know many people who would gladly select that choice as their answer to the polling question, yet who very much are "Darwinists" and very much NOT fans of "ID".

Yet Darwinism, or Darwinistic Evolution is a very specific term. And just about everybody disagrees with it.

Keep believing that if it gives you comfort, as it clearly does. I won't try to disappoint you with reality.

137 posted on 03/08/2006 8:08:16 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson