[narby]

Except amoung the statiscally challenged (which is seemingly a trait of Darwinists)

Those who are statistically challenged might take the fact that the %1.3 were merely those who accepted evolution and believed that God had nothing to do with it. Those who are statistically challenged would skip right over the %31 who accept evolution, but thought God did have something to do with it.

As for the number who don't accept evolution, I'm sure you'll find a similar number believe in Ghosts, the Bermuda Triangle phenomenon and the Loch Ness monster. I'm not in that group. Are you?

[narby]

Those who are statistically challenged might take the fact that the %1.3 were merely those who accepted evolution and believed that God had nothing to do with it.

[Boy, that sentence didn't make any sense. Feel free to ignore it]

[bvw]

I'm in the spelling-challenged group.

[bvw]

The thirty-one per cent (31%) then have the ID position. Not Darwinism. That sunspots are said to "evolve" (a recent newsreport) does not mean Darwinism. Evolution is a very generic term. And that common general usage -- such as the evolution of sunspots is of course most people sign on to it!

Yet Darwinism, or Darwinistic Evolution is a very specific term. And just about everybody disagrees with it.