Skip to comments.
New York State legislature considering legislation requiring companies to pay employees' health care
Associated Press via syracuse.com ^
| March 7, 2006 7:07 PM
| Candice Choi
Posted on 03/08/2006 11:38:34 AM PST by jmyrlefuller
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-113 next last
To: dfwgator
Unfortunately, I agree with you. Seems it makes no difference to the Conservatives or the Liberals since Health care just represents government intrusion no matter what end you are on. Another entitlement backed by both sides.
To: jmyrlefuller; Mrs.Nooseman; Diana in Wisconsin; bfree; Graybeard58; CSM; metesky; wanderin; ...
Combined WalMart and Nanny State PING.............
If you want on or off either list let me know :)
Bruno doesn't sound like the sharpest knife in the draw. How moronic can these people get?
42
posted on
03/08/2006 12:17:09 PM PST
by
Gabz
(Smokers are the beta version)
To: tfecw
Assuming companies are still turning a profit even with the extra cost, why would they leave?
I must agree, the pols did their homework it appears.
Retailers in high population areas will be unlikely to leave and the pols know it thats why manufacturing is exempt from the ruling because they can move to another state without losing their customer base.
I don't think this is going to get passed.
43
posted on
03/08/2006 12:17:23 PM PST
by
HEY4QDEMS
(No animals were harmed during the creation of this post.)
To: Gabz
Morning Gabz.
Your question is rhetorical,right?
To: Gabz
To: jmyrlefuller
If this bill passes, you can kiss New York good-bye. I already did, years ago.
46
posted on
03/08/2006 12:21:18 PM PST
by
Gritty
(Big Government is by definition remote government – Mark Steyn)
To: Steve_Seattle
If health care is a fundamental rightWhich it isn't. If something requires somebody else to give something up for you to have it, it isn't a right.
47
posted on
03/08/2006 12:22:54 PM PST
by
dfwgator
To: albertp; Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Americanwolf; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
48
posted on
03/08/2006 12:24:41 PM PST
by
freepatriot32
(Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
To: jmyrlefuller
New Jersey anyone? Somebody call Big John. It's time to move.
49
posted on
03/08/2006 12:25:34 PM PST
by
WideGlide
(That light at the end of the tunnel might be a muzzle flash.)
To: bill1952
This bill if passed will drive down premium costs, Medicaid costs, and employee contribution costs, if done properly.
50
posted on
03/08/2006 12:26:37 PM PST
by
Realism
(Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
To: jmyrlefuller
51
posted on
03/08/2006 12:27:03 PM PST
by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: jmyrlefuller
"...shifting the cost of skyrocketing health care in many cases from taxpayers to big businesses."
The taxpayers, or consumers, in this country pay for everything!
52
posted on
03/08/2006 12:27:26 PM PST
by
ops33
(Retired USAF Senior Master Sergeant)
To: HEY4QDEMS
The extent of the cash business in the neighborhoods is politley ignored by politicians in Queens and elsewhere. One reason that blacks and whites have trouble starting businesses is that it is harder (although not impossible) for them to operate outside the purview of tax authorities. So Asian stores and restaurants flourish with lower (tax free) margins while everybody else is priced out.
To: dfwgator
Access to medical facilities, getting medical attention, etc...they may be "fundamental rights," but having someone else pay for your access to medical attention is certainly not.
54
posted on
03/08/2006 12:28:08 PM PST
by
CT-Freeper
(Said the perpetually dejected Mets fan.)
To: Plexi
No kidding. Imagine the employers with just over 100 employees. There's a good chance they'll lay off enough to get under 100 or convert the right number to part-time.
---
Unfortunately there probably will be legal tests in the law that will prohibit this.
What it will do is produce a slew of companies that have 99 employees and forever will turn away business rather than hire one more employee.
55
posted on
03/08/2006 12:30:13 PM PST
by
Cheburashka
(World's only Spatula City certified spatula repair and maintenance specialist!!!)
To: Realism
if done properly.And if my Aunt had you-know-what, she'd be my uncle.
56
posted on
03/08/2006 12:30:27 PM PST
by
dfwgator
To: jmyrlefuller
"ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) The sales clerk at The Gap, the perfume lady at the department store and the Wal-Mart Stores Inc. cashier would all get health insurance from their employers under a bill announced Tuesday, shifting the cost of skyrocketing health care in many cases from taxpayers to big businesses."
More and more people will be at the malls in Jersey! More part timers, and more people forgetting about earning any more than min. wage.......BRILLIANT!
To: jmyrlefuller
Please pass this!
Other states will be happy to become the home base for many a former New York based companies.
58
posted on
03/08/2006 12:33:04 PM PST
by
fhlh
(Polls are for Strippers.)
Easy solution. Reduce the number of full time employees (if possible) to 99 and employ the rest as part time workers.
Health insurance is not a right.
59
posted on
03/08/2006 12:34:00 PM PST
by
peggybac
(Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing)
To: jmyrlefuller
State Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno showed some initial support for the bill, saying taxpayers shouldn't have to foot the bill for big companies. For big companies? How about taxpayers footing the bill for the individuals, many of whom have chosen to order their lives in such a way as to not buy health insurance? What do "big companies" have to do with this?
60
posted on
03/08/2006 12:35:11 PM PST
by
wouldntbprudent
(If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-113 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson