You can not claim the name is not Biblical when it is in the Bible. An argument over Saint Jerome's intentions is pretty useless 1700 years after he wrote it.
And until you produce some "Credible" evidence otherwise it goes into the same bin as your other statements about Saint Paul's marketing strategy.
> You can not claim the name is not Biblical when it is in the Bible.
So... no matter how badly translated a Bible might be, it's all perfectly valid, then?
"Thou shalt commit adultery" 1631 Cambridge edition
> An argument over Saint Jerome's intentions is pretty useless 1700 years after he wrote it.
Ah. Then the rest of the Bible is even more useless, since it's even older. Good to know!