> You can not claim the name is not Biblical when it is in the Bible.
So... no matter how badly translated a Bible might be, it's all perfectly valid, then?
"Thou shalt commit adultery" 1631 Cambridge edition
> An argument over Saint Jerome's intentions is pretty useless 1700 years after he wrote it.
Ah. Then the rest of the Bible is even more useless, since it's even older. Good to know!
"...the Bible is even more useless,...
That was pretty much Thomas Paine's opinion too.
Your post is a good example of limited logic, or maybe I should be more clear, reading into it what you want to see.
Eyes that will not see. Ears that will not hear.