Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jack Bull
There's another interesting angle. The Clintons are legally married yet physically not married. It's probably certain they have separate bank accounts and records. Yet, they obviously must still have joint assets and debts. Who is paying what bills and from what source is their joint income coming from?

We know she gets a senate salary. It's not that much in the big scheme of things. He gets all kinds of money from God knows where. Is some of that Dubai money finding its way into her accounts?

The problem is that income and outgo of the Clintons is probably so well hidden, so convoluted with false leads and trails, so protected with layers of accountants and lawyers, that undoubtedly even the Justice Department or the IRS could ever unravel the sources of the Corrupt Couple's millions which appear to be piling up like the gold of King Midas. Remember, as his wife, she's entitled to part of all his assets if they divorce. He must be paying her plenty to not seek one at this time while he's still on the gravy train.

For her part, a divorce now would be deadly for her presidential aspirations.

All this, of course, is sick, sick, sick. Most people don't look this deep into the Clinton "marriage". These two are con artists of the first rank. And they are surrounded by rank people who protect and enable them.

Since they are still legally married, there's no doubt in my mind that Her Heinous is benefitting directly or indirectly from Bill's lobbyist status with Dubai and other Arab states. Money is fungible.

Leni

12 posted on 03/08/2006 5:37:48 AM PST by MinuteGal (Sail the Bounding Main to the Balmy, Palmy Caribbean on FReeps Ahoy 4. Register Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MinuteGal
For her part, a divorce now would be deadly for her presidential aspirations

The closer it gets to '08 the more you are right. If she had divorced him say, 2001, she might have had a better shot at the WH without the baggage of Bill.
13 posted on 03/08/2006 5:47:01 AM PST by stylin19a (Do you still have sex or are you already playing golf?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: MinuteGal

I have always thought that the only way for her to get to the WH would be to divorce Slick Willy. But, I don't think there is anything she can do at this point.

I hope the woman running against Hillary makes this conflict-of-interest story a huge deal. This makes the Jack Abramoff thing look like a nothing story.


14 posted on 03/08/2006 5:57:03 AM PST by Jack Bull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: MinuteGal
Nothing has changed in the 30 years that I have been following the Clinton's political antics. It has always been married but separate.
16 posted on 03/08/2006 6:08:36 AM PST by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: MinuteGal

Senate spouses should be bound by the Senate ethics rules.

If folks can't handle that, they have no business being Senators.

But the chances that the Senate is going to close down the biggest back-door bribery scheme used to enrich themselves is about zilch. Not gonna happen. Too many Senators have a hand in that particular cookie jar.

If the 'Pubbies wanted to cement their majority status for the next 50 years, they would become the party of Good Government, and really do something about corruption in Washington. But they are more interested in the quick kill and the fast buck, so they won't do it.


27 posted on 03/08/2006 7:49:01 AM PST by bondjamesbond (RICE '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson