[Condor51]

Whites already are in Chicago, they're 3rd.

1. 'Hispanics'
2. Blacks
3. Whites

[HostileTerritory]

What about with all the suburbs, though? That's what's new.

I'm sure there is a much larger population of blacks than Hispanics in Chicago. There are three black congressmen and only one Latino.

[Brilliant]

Well, Hispanics are usually white.

[ohioman]

Why are Hispanics (folks with at least part Spanish ancestry) not counted as White?

[Clemenza]

In the Chicago suburbs, Latinos now outnumber blacks.

[unixfox]

Whites already are in Chicago, they're 3rd.

Yeah, but I bet they aren't called "minorities" are they?

[from occupied ga]

Whites already are in Chicago, they're 3rd. 'Hispanics' Blacks Whites

My guess is if you rank them by tax burden they pay you'd get:
Whites
Hispanics
Blacks

[sandbar]

>>>Whites already are in Chicago, they're 3rd.
'Hispanics'
Blacks
Whites>>>

And again, still excluded under Affirmative Action. That rule will be taken down when whites are minority enough to qualify for Affirmative Action. Oh wait, they are. So they should just rename it the "Whitey gotta pay" rule.

[Do not dub me shapka broham]

And yet Richard Daley is still Mayor for Life.

You've got to love Chicago politics.

LOL.

[television is just wrong]

lol, same in Los angeles...

[gotribe]

Whites already are in Chicago, they're 3rd.

Interesting. So when the blacks and media talk about "minorities" in Chicago, they're talking about whites. Whoda thunkit!