1 posted on
03/07/2006 1:48:03 AM PST by
rhema
To: rhema
If abortion is a private matter according to
Roe v. Wade, how can there be any public funding???
Roe v. Wade, if strictly interpreted, would prohibit public funding for abortion since public funding for abortion is a form of societal intervention in reproduction - - the very thing prohibited by Roe v. Wade.
To: rhema
First sentence,.....poor women. What is the definition of poor women?
Women who have sex, get pregnant and seek free abortions at taxpayer expense is like someone taking a crap in the parking lot expecting someone else to pay to clean it up.
3 posted on
03/07/2006 2:05:29 AM PST by
SR 50
(Larry)
To: rhema
Nice to see the counter attack beginning in the courts.
4 posted on
03/07/2006 2:13:18 AM PST by
zarf
(It's time for a college football playoff system.)
To: rhema
My heart leaps every time I see another assault on this terrible "procedure".
5 posted on
03/07/2006 3:57:19 AM PST by
starbase
(Understanding Written Propaganda (click "starbase" to learn 22 manipulating tricks!!))
To: rhema
Good to see some fight in them but...
despite lawmakers voting to prohibit that from occurring in virtually all situations ...is seeking legislative alternatives to counteract the decision...
If their Supreme Court ignored the law the first time why would they uphold it next time around?
6 posted on
03/07/2006 3:58:17 AM PST by
libertylover
(Democrats: Trying since 1968 to transform America into The Great Satan.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson