Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tbird5
They're just slandering Kinkade because he actually has talent, a rare trait in today's artistic world. You're not supposed to be successful unless you do something avant- garde, like bescumber a painting of Mary or pour paint haphazardly on a canvas from a ladder. The Dadaists' proclamation that "art is shit" turned out to be quite a self-fulfilling prophecy.
4 posted on 03/06/2006 8:32:30 PM PST by lesser_satan (You know, if ifs and buts and were candy and nuts, every day would be Christmas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lesser_satan
They're just slandering Kinkade because he actually has talent, a rare trait in today's artistic world.

Did you forget the sarcasm tag or are you King Cheese?

16 posted on 03/06/2006 8:39:49 PM PST by zarf (It's time for a college football playoff system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: lesser_satan
"They're just slandering Kinkade because he actually has talent, a rare trait in today's artistic world. You're not supposed to be successful unless you do something avant- garde, like bescumber a painting of Mary or pour paint haphazardly on a canvas from a ladder. The Dadaists' proclamation that "art is shit" turned out to be quite a self-fulfilling prophecy."

Precisely. And in their eyes the even more grave sin is that Kinkade got rich from his art IN SPITE OF the art critics' constant put downs of his work.

18 posted on 03/06/2006 8:40:25 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: lesser_satan
READ my post above yours (#3) and tell me WHERE I said ONE WORD about his art. I could care LESS about his art. He is an unethical crook in his BUSINESS PRACTICES.

Basically, he found a legal way to "print money" with his prints. A few years later, that market collapsed, and his company filed Chapter 13 (yet it didn't affect him or his calssic car collection). It only resulted in the "little people" down the line being laid off, as well as many buyers who realized that the prints we bought for $800 were selling for $200 8 years later....he sold my ex a "bill of goods", so to speak...

21 posted on 03/06/2006 8:43:48 PM PST by Al Simmons (Four-time Bush Voter 1994-2004...PROUD TO BE A BUSHBOT!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: lesser_satan
I'm sorry to disagree with you, but this guy is merely a mass-production artist who is imitating a trick of light that was invented by the Hudson Valley School . . . and not doing a particularly good job at it, either. His work defies the laws of physics and perspective. He is also incapable of drawing human or animal figures correctly.

If you like his work, fine -- it's a free country. But don't mistake a one-trick pony for real talent.

His financial machinations don't interest me at all, plenty of good artists (like, say, Dali) have been involved in financial shenanigans. But he isn't one of them.

35 posted on 03/06/2006 8:53:40 PM PST by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: lesser_satan
They're just slandering Kinkade because he actually has talent, a rare trait in today's artistic world.

Somewhat rare, perhaps, thanks to "art schools", but--as Art Renewal Center's 'Living Masters' gallery makes clear, not too terribly much so.

86 posted on 03/06/2006 10:25:25 PM PST by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: lesser_satan
I won't comment on his personal life. But the reason the art experts despise him is because he doesn't attack faith, family and the Christian religion in his paintings. You don't hear much written about the dark side of Andrew Serrano. But its open season on Thomas Kincaide because his art doesn't follow post-modernist conventions. A thought worth pondering.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

95 posted on 03/06/2006 11:17:11 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: lesser_satan

"...he actually has talent..."

Kinkade doesn't have vision. He paints a pretty picture without depth or dimension. It could be a piece of paint-by-numbers or mother's embroidery for that matter.

It doesn't have the passion that paintings should have.

As always, IMHO..


111 posted on 03/07/2006 4:25:16 AM PST by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: lesser_satan

"They're just slandering Kinkade because he actually has talent, a rare trait in today's artistic world. You're not supposed to be successful unless you do something avant- garde, like bescumber a painting of Mary or pour paint haphazardly on a canvas from a ladder. The Dadaists' proclamation that "art is shit" turned out to be quite a self-fulfilling prophecy."

Speaking as an artist, I take GREAT exception to this - the guy is a hack. Great marketer, but a hack artist, period. His "art" is in the same vain as the guy who painted the "happy trees" - simplistic, mechanical exercises in fluff and cliche. His "art" is sappy, cliched, his colors atrocious, his skill at composition stilted and jueveniile, and his use of light and shadow clumsy and contrived. High school art students can outpaint him, and do.

There are real artists out there who should be wealthy beyond their means, but are ignored. Kinkade simply fills a niche, the "interior design art" field, ie. they're tailored to match your couch. He met the right market at the right time. He will never hang in musuems or galleries (that he doesnt own), and will never be remembered as anything more than a hack painter. His "art" is just offensive to the eye as the dung Madonna, because of how BAD it is, and how much attention he's stolen from real artists.

If you buy his prints, thinking you've made an investment, welcome to the 'A Sucker Is Born Every Day" Club - you been HAD.

I worked in the publishing field with companies that make similar products. These "limited editions" are a sham - they cost a couple dollars to print, and the "limited" nature is that they only print 10,000 AT THAT SIZE - you may have number 578 of 10,000 @ 18x24", but rest assured, they will print it at 5x7" or other sizes, thus dilluting your "limited edition". The even have techniques now to replicate brush strokes on canvas with lamination and inkjet technologies, and they sell these as "painted" by the artist.

I've also heard dark rumors about the guy, and his behavior, and the worst was a rumor that if you were'nt of his faith, forget working with him, or getting a license. Rumor, but from very respectable sources. I had very brief moments where I worked with licensees of his, and they all said he was extremely hard to work with, as he was rude, arrogant, if not downright mean. He puts forth a "gentle Christian" face to the public, but in business, he's a total #@#hole.

Telent, my @#$. He's done more to make art a joke than the fools in the liberal circles who put crucifixes in urine or dung on the Madonna.


232 posted on 03/07/2006 7:28:45 AM PST by ByDesign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: lesser_satan

Just because it's not a tin can of excrement doesn't mean it's good.


355 posted on 03/07/2006 4:11:42 PM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: lesser_satan

And despite what you think, actual talent isn't rare in the art world.


356 posted on 03/07/2006 4:13:01 PM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson