Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dark Portrait of a 'Painter of Light'
latimes. ^ | March 5, 2006 | Kim Christensen

Posted on 03/06/2006 8:18:41 PM PST by tbird5

Christian-themed artist Thomas Kinkade is accused of ruthless tactics and seamy personal conduct. He disputes the allegations.

Thomas Kinkade is famous for his luminous landscapes and street scenes, those dreamy, deliberately inspirational images he says have brought "God's light" into people's lives, even as they have made him one of America's most collected artists.

A devout Christian who calls himself the "Painter of Light," Kinkade trades heavily on his beliefs and says God has guided his brush — and his life — for the last 20 years.

"When I got saved, God became my art agent," he said in a 2004 video biography, genteel in tone and rich in the themes of faith and family values that have helped win him legions of fans, albeit few among art critics.

But some former Kinkade employees, gallery operators and others contend that the Painter of Light has a decidedly dark side.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: art; butisitart; kinkade; thomaskinkade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 381-400 next last
To: Beelzebubba
His art would have no meaning if some didn't think it sucked.

His art has no intrinsic meaning, anyway. That's one of the reasons it sucks as art.

Art, at it's basis, is a means of communication, a transfer of message and evoked emotion from the artist to the viewer. Pollack and the rest if the trendy of his time strove to remove all message from their art, and leave it up to the viewer to get whatever he could out of it.

Pollock's works are art at about the level of a teenager screaming "You just don't understand me!!!!" is a conversation. Trite, shallow, repetitive, unproductive, masturbatory and one-sided.

But the hostility is less directed at Pollack than at the waste of time and dead end pursuits it has sent the "Fine Art" world off in for 70 years.

261 posted on 03/07/2006 8:09:16 AM PST by LexBaird ("I'm not questioning your patriotism, I'm answering your treason."--JennysCool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: ByDesign

"contrived" Perfect word for this subject matter.


262 posted on 03/07/2006 8:09:26 AM PST by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
I've seen many of Rothko's works in person. I worked for the Huntington Galleries and the Harry Ransom Center at the University of Texas, back in the seventies, and hung some of them for shows. The Rothko Chapel in Houston is probably the best place to see his later work. I understand they changed the lighting from how he originally intended it, as the sunlight was fading the canvases. I haven't been back since then. As Rothko's final series turned from the lighter pastels to the dark blood of the final paintings in the series, I found looking at them to be an experience somewhat like Jack Torrence's wife when she found the manuscript of hundreds of pages of "All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy." They are the product of a complex mind descending into despair and finally suicide. I find them disturbing.

Rothko was also somewhat of a failure as a painter, in that his paintings deteriorated badly over a period of about ten years. I was fortunate enough to see the Rothko Chapel before the red of the paintings turned to black, as they are now.

In one sense, my comparison of Kincaide to Rothko is unfortunate. Kincaide is primarily a businessman, and I think he has little emotional attachment to his paintings. Rothko was deadly serious, but also a deeply flawed man. If you understand what he was doing, and I think I might, as I went through a depressive period when I was younger, the paintings, when taken in series, are the unconscious result of a mind descending into madness. What is most chilling to me is that in the final paintings, hanging at the chapel in Houston, he was beyond even romanticizing suicide. Like Pollock, who died in a fiery car crash, Rothko chose an end that mimicked his art, by hanging his clothes in an orderly fashion, slitting the arteries in his arms, and sitting quietly as the blood ran into the basins of water. The wreck was Pollock's last splatter painting; the dark reds swirling in the basin of water was Rothko's last painting of his "colors" series: dark red, without hope, and made in a very temporary medium. (note, these are my beliefs and are universally laughed at by most art critics.)

263 posted on 03/07/2006 8:10:50 AM PST by Richard Kimball (I like to make everyone's day a little more surreal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird

Then you definitely should not buy any of his pieces. Problem solved.


264 posted on 03/07/2006 8:14:37 AM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: Sisku Hanne

They sure were,and I enjoy working on them. I have a 1966 GT350 Shelby Mustang.


265 posted on 03/07/2006 8:15:54 AM PST by painter (We celebrate liberty which comes from God not from government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

"the paintings, when taken in series, are the unconscious result of a mind descending into madness. What is most chilling to me is that in the final paintings, hanging at the chapel in Houston, he was beyond even romanticizing suicide."

Many years ago, I went to a full retrospective of Rothko at the Guggenheim. You followed the spiral of the gallery all the way down - and his paintings, literally, all the way down - chronologically. Toward the end, you could feel the despair, see what was going to happen.


266 posted on 03/07/2006 8:16:32 AM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: BibChr

I am one who loved Kincaide, Bob Ross and Precious Moments. Some of the other art works posted are not my style.


267 posted on 03/07/2006 8:25:41 AM PST by MamaB (mom to an Angel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

If people have the money to pay what the artist sells, then I will not complain. It is the holier than thou attitude on some of the posts that really bother me. What a sad world it would be if everyone liked the same things.


268 posted on 03/07/2006 8:29:05 AM PST by MamaB (mom to an Angel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

There was another TV painter, a German or Austrian guy who Bob Ross "borrowed" his technique from that used to "fire it into zie booshes" (the paint or whatever). That was a running joke between my ex wife and me.

Kincaide is just worthless sentimental, embarrassing crap. It's a joke.


269 posted on 03/07/2006 8:30:29 AM PST by garyhope (In vino veritas. Ars longa, vita brevis, too brevis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

You are not the only one who thinks this is very odd. I love his art. Our daughter, Jan, and I would go in a store here that sold his paintings. She liked his work, too. I really, really miss her.


270 posted on 03/07/2006 8:33:25 AM PST by MamaB (mom to an Angel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Dinsdale
"More power to him if he can get people to pay $800 for prints of paint by number work he completed."

May Spiny Norman track you down and eat your smarmy little a**. ;>)

271 posted on 03/07/2006 8:35:08 AM PST by Al Simmons (Four-time Bush Voter 1994-2004...PROUD TO BE A BUSHBOT!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003
Then you definitely should not buy any of his pieces. Problem solved

Agreed. Meanwhile, I know where you can get a beef heart and some cheap Pakistani surgical instruments, so you can have a copy of the art you like for your collection.

272 posted on 03/07/2006 8:39:25 AM PST by LexBaird ("I'm not questioning your patriotism, I'm answering your treason."--JennysCool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird

Sorry, we only buy originals. :)


273 posted on 03/07/2006 8:40:27 AM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: MamaB
It's fine to buy what you like. It's not fine if you bought it partially because you were dishonestly told it was a good investment, or that it would increase in value.

If you like Kincade, I bet there are other artists whose work you would like just as much and would also be Christian in theme and beautiful. Check some of the links that people have provided on this thread.

274 posted on 03/07/2006 8:42:42 AM PST by Miss Marple (Lord, please look after Mozart Lover's and Jemian's sons and keep them strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003

Hurry, before it rots.


275 posted on 03/07/2006 8:43:49 AM PST by LexBaird ("I'm not questioning your patriotism, I'm answering your treason."--JennysCool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: Republicanprofessor
I can't even look at Kincade's work

I had never heard of him. He seems to be the Rod McKuen of painting. Interesting that he "paints light." What are other people painting?

There is a lot of Hudson River stuff in Washington, DC, where I live, and every visitor's favorite is the voyage of life series by Cole.

Childhood
Youth
Manhood
Old Age

276 posted on 03/07/2006 8:46:51 AM PST by monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: painter
I have a 1966 GT350 Shelby Mustang

Congratulations. Thats what I call excellent taste in art. Posting a reply to you is probably as close as i'll ever get to such a thing ;o)
277 posted on 03/07/2006 8:47:57 AM PST by Liberty Valance (We're gonna party like it's 1836 - Happy Birthday Texas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: tbird5
So what? If you like his art, you like it. If you think it's kitsch, so be it. Who cares what his personality is like?

If you liked Dumbo or Sleeping Beauty - does it matter that Walt Disney could hardly say three words in a row with out one of them being f@ck? (He only referred to Donald Duck as "that f@cking duck" - never by "Donald".)

So what? Do you care? I don't. I still laugh at Donald Duck, no matter what Walt called him.

278 posted on 03/07/2006 8:50:01 AM PST by Tokra (I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trident/Delta
"Unless you bought them direct, I cannot see how you can blame him for what a gallery owner did. I can't find a problem with his actions."

I see. Then you would also agree that Adolf Hitler has no blame for what those pesky executioners at Auschwitz were doing, huh?

279 posted on 03/07/2006 8:50:29 AM PST by Al Simmons (Four-time Bush Voter 1994-2004...PROUD TO BE A BUSHBOT!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

Then it is the buyer who is to blame. He/she should have done homework before spending a lot of money for something. I collect dolls but I buy them for how they look not what they will sell for in the next 50 years. Some have been expensive for me but Jan and I loved them. I am trying to find some way to sell or give away a few. We probably have about 100 or more. I even took one in a Christening dress down to my mom in MS after Jan died. She loves it as do the others in the nursing home. There is just something about a baby doll! BTW, my mom will be 102 in April.


280 posted on 03/07/2006 8:58:11 AM PST by MamaB (mom to an Angel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 381-400 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson