Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NJ Bill Would Prohibit Anonymous Posts on Forums...
NJ legislislation ^ | 3/6/06

Posted on 03/06/2006 7:35:54 PM PST by finnman69

ASSEMBLY, No. 1327

STATE OF NEW JERSEY

212th LEGISLATURE

PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2006 SESSION

Sponsored by:

Assemblyman PETER J. BIONDI

District 16 (Morris and Somerset)

SYNOPSIS

Makes certain operators of interactive computer services and Internet service providers liable to persons injured by false or defamatory messages posted on public forum websites.

CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT

As introduced.

An Act concerning the posting of certain Internet messages and supplementing chapter 38A of Title 2A of the New Jersey Statutes.

Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

1. As used in this act:

"Information content provider" means any person or entity that is responsible, in whole or in part, for the creation or development of information provided through the Internet or any other interactive computer service.

"Interactive computer service" means any information system, service, or access software provider that provides or enables computer access by multiple users to a computer server, including specifically a service or system that provides service to the Internet.

"Internet" means the international computer network of both federal and non-federal interoperable packet switched data networks.

"Internet service provider" or "provider" means any person, business or organization qualified to do business in this State that provides individuals, corporations, or other entities with the ability to connect to the Internet through equipment that is located in this State.

"Operator" means any person, business or organization qualified to do business in this State that operates an interactive computer service.

2. The operator of any interactive computer service or an Internet service provider shall establish, maintain and enforce a policy to require any information content provider who posts written messages on a public forum website either to be identified by a legal name and address, or to register a legal name and address with the operator of the interactive computer service or the Internet service provider through which the information content provider gains access to the interactive computer service or Internet, as appropriate.

3. An operator of an interactive computer service or an Internet service provider shall establish and maintain reasonable procedures to enable any person to request and obtain disclosure of the legal name and address of an information content provider who posts false or defamatory information about the person on a public forum website.

4. Any person who is damaged by false or defamatory written messages that originate from an information content provider who posts such messages on a public forum website may file suit in Superior Court against an operator or provider that fails to establish, maintain and enforce the policy required pursuant to section 2 of P.L. , c. (C.) (pending before the Legislature as this bill), and may recover compensatory and punitive damages and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee, cost of investigation and litigation from such operator or provider.

5. This act shall take effect on the 90th day following enactment.

STATEMENT

This bill would require an operator of any interactive computer service or an Internet service provider to establish, maintain and enforce a policy requiring an information content provider who posts messages on a public forum website either to be identified by legal name and address or to register a legal name and address with the operator or provider prior to posting messages on a public forum website.

The bill requires an operator of an interactive computer service or an Internet service provider to establish and maintain reasonable procedures to enable any person to request and obtain disclosure of the legal name and address of an information content provider who posts false or defamatory information about the person on a public forum website.

In addition, the bill makes any operator or Internet service provider liable for compensatory and punitive damages as well as costs of a law suit filed by a person damaged by the posting of such messages if the operator or Internet service provider fails to establish, maintain and enforce the policy required by section 2 of the bill.


TOPICS: Government; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: internet; newjersey; peterbiondi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-203 next last
To: small voice in the wilderness

These government types think they have some sort of control over you and me. The internet thinks differently. They can pass all the crap they want to. They can even shut down the internet. But encoding and technology will overtake them and leave them on the doorstep of yesterday.


41 posted on 03/06/2006 7:45:16 PM PST by groanup (Shred for Ian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Wow, I am an "information content provider"!

And my ex-wife said I'd never amount to anything...

42 posted on 03/06/2006 7:45:23 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
One more comment...this will directly lead to the deaths of some people...of course the dems don't care if people die from their idiotic laws. I have, for instance, received death threats from muslims on other message boards...so if I had to post with my actual name they will be able to locate me and follow through on their threats...and, of course, the dems won't do anything about muslims making those threats or following through on them. Idiots.
43 posted on 03/06/2006 7:45:28 PM PST by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bella_Bru

OK, thanks for clarifying. Like I said, it's been nearly 10 years since I signed on here. I did use my real name as a screenname when Free Republic first started out but I changed to this moniker in 1997.


44 posted on 03/06/2006 7:46:07 PM PST by SamAdams76 (Venus is dazzling, but not very high, in the western sky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Hill of Tara

I'm sorry, I'm in the process of changing my name to Anon E. Mus. Will this be ok?


45 posted on 03/06/2006 7:46:15 PM PST by Bushman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

Why we keep electing lawyers to office is beyond me to begin with. Are there no worthy intelligent people other than a bunch of bottom feeding lawyers?


46 posted on 03/06/2006 7:46:15 PM PST by The Worthless Miracle ("Better put some ice on that")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Hill of Tara

Biondi is a Rino


47 posted on 03/06/2006 7:46:25 PM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
How do they intend to enforce it?

The same way they enforce "no anonymous messages in public restrooms".

It's the end for Kilroy...

48 posted on 03/06/2006 7:46:25 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

The maroon who proposed this: Peter J. Biondi, a Republican


49 posted on 03/06/2006 7:46:38 PM PST by Babu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

I wonder what the "author" of the Federalist Papers (Publius) would have to say on the subject of anonymity?


50 posted on 03/06/2006 7:47:03 PM PST by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
"How do they intend to enforce it? "

Well our Chinese brothers have figured it out. This knowledge will be another product that we can import from our Chinese comrades.

I'm all for this, knowledge and opinions are to valuable to kept by individuals. The needs of the state are much more important than the rights of some computer gadfly.
If people can post opinions anywhere and anytime, we will have total anarchy and our government could be threatened. This must not be allowed.
51 posted on 03/06/2006 7:47:09 PM PST by HereInTheHeartland (Never bring a knife to a gun fight, or a Democrat to do serious work...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

How to wreck the internet in one easy step...


52 posted on 03/06/2006 7:47:17 PM PST by VoiceOfBruck (And then we was beat up by a bible salesman and banished from Woolworth's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

Well I just found out something NEW..I thought all this time you were *mrs. mith*!


53 posted on 03/06/2006 7:47:30 PM PST by small voice in the wilderness (...what do you mean "Candy isn't married to Alan..?...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

And how do we know that you are the REAL Jim Robinson?



LOL


54 posted on 03/06/2006 7:48:13 PM PST by Txsleuth (Bush-Bot;WaterBucket Brigader;and fan of defconw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: The Worthless Miracle

"My God, this is unreal. Can they not simply leave things alone? Why does our beloved government think it has the need to come in to EVERY aspect of life? This is ridiculous, and those responsible should booted from office.
It would be more "dangerous" if peoples' real names are used, anyway..."


see my tagline :)


55 posted on 03/06/2006 7:48:36 PM PST by Hill of Tara ("The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: pcottraux

Same here


56 posted on 03/06/2006 7:48:52 PM PST by Paul_Denton (Every single troll is now an enemy of the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Hill of Tara
I'm assuming this fascist clown is a DemocRAT?

Nope. The fascist clown is a Republican.

57 posted on 03/06/2006 7:49:04 PM PST by KarlInOhio (The tree of liberty is getting awfully parched.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

I just signed up in December and I "think" I only gave my email address. Shows how long my memory is.


58 posted on 03/06/2006 7:49:15 PM PST by jazusamo (:Gregory was riled while Hume smiled:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
so much for freedom of speech and a free press. Of course this law would only be enforced on Free Republic and other conservative/libertarian boards and not on say the Daily Kos or Democratic Underground.
59 posted on 03/06/2006 7:49:30 PM PST by spikeytx86 (Beware the Democratic party has been over run by CRAB PEOPLE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

JEEEEEEEEEEEEZ.......you alrady have my credit card info and now you will get my name....LOL


60 posted on 03/06/2006 7:49:38 PM PST by mystery-ak (Army Wife and Army Mother.....toughest job in the military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-203 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson