Posted on 03/05/2006 9:21:44 PM PST by Pikamax
Given that it's Oscar time, I nominate the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences for Best Bunch of Hypocrites. That’s because this year’s dirty little secret is the anecdotal evidence pouring in to me about hetero members being unwilling to screen Brokeback Mountain. For a community that takes pride in progressive values, it’s shameful that Hollywood’s homophobia may be on a par with Pat Robertson’s.
Despite the hype you’re reading in the press and on the Internet about Brokeback, with its eight nominations, being the supposed favorite to take home the Best Picture Oscar on March 5, Crash could end up winning. The issue isn’t which film is better. The issue is more like which movie was seen by the Academy. Frankly, I find horrifying each whispered admission to me from Academy members who usually pose as social liberals that they’re disgusted by even the possibility of glimpsing simulated gay sex. Earth to the easily offended: This movie has been criticized for being too sexually tame. Hey, Academy, what are you worried about: that you’ll turn gay or, worse, get a stiffie by just the hint of hunk-on-hunk action?
That Brokeback isn’t the Oscar favorite may have been foreshadowed at the SAG awards, when Crash topped it for best picture and Philip Seymour Hoffman won over Heath Ledger. Remember: Truman Capote was so unthreatening — as compared to the in-your-face sexiness of Ledger looking longingly at Jake Gyllenhaal’s loins — that Johnny Carson used to invite him into the nation’s living rooms as a frequent guest on The Tonight Show.
It’s not that Crash isn’t Oscar-worthy and Brokeback is. Both are good, if flawed, movies. Crash makes up in aesthetic bleakness what it lacks in subtlety — Los Angeles is a city of minorities divided but colliding, duh! — but it’s also gripping and powerful. Brokeback gives us something we haven’t seen before — closet-case sheepherders tastefully presented so they redefine the notion of love. But it’s also slow and ponderous.
Look, I do understand the degree to which the cowboy has been an iconic figure in motion pictures through the ages. Also, that many geriatric Academy members not only worked on oaters, but also worshipped Audie Murphy, Gene Autry, John Wayne and other saddle-sore celluloid heroes. And that only an equally iconic figure like Clint Eastwood could redefine the genre in Unforgiven in a way that didn’t turn off the old-timers. But, jeez, I’m not just talking about the geezers. I’m talking baby boomers and younger Academy members who are sketched out about seeing Brokeback.
Sure, even without seeing the movie, they could feel guilt-tripped or succumb to a herd mentality to vote for the gay-cowboy movie and strike a blow against Republican wedge politics and religious hatemongering. But, if they don’t, then Brokeback may lose for all the Right’s reasons.
Keep Reading
Cantcha just see red-staters licking their lips to give Hollywood a verbal ass whooping after looking at Tuesday’s Oscar nominations? “Boy hidey, those show-biz folk are just a homo-promotin’, liberal-media-embracin’, minority-lovin’, devil-worshippin’, pimp-hustlin’, terrorist-protectin’ bunch of pansies, commies and traitors.” Or hollering “We was robbed!” when Walk the Line was blown off as a Best Picture contender.
On the other hand, you’d think the religious right would be dropping to their knees and thanking the Lord, for instance, about the miracle of Munich and Spielberg squeezing out nominations. It turned out just as I predicted back around Thanksgiving: Because of Steven’s involvement, Academy voters ignored the loudmouth neocons at The Weekly Standard and National Review who denounced the movie’s POV, and instead accepted on faith Spielberg’s much-fictionalized take on the Munich Olympics aftermath.
Overall, Tinseltown’s never been so proud to be savaged by right-wing punditry. That is, everywhere but at ABC, the award show’s broadcaster, where suits are tearing out their hair plugs anticipating in-the-cellar ratings because of the celeb polemics, the lack of blockbusters among the nominees, host Jon Stewart bitch-slapping Dubya, Dick Cheney and parent company Disney’s CEO Bob Iger. (The Daily Show wit reported on the recent $7 billion Pixar deal by asking, “Do you feel your children are beholden to too many multinational corporations?”)
Its an election year and Hollywood doesn't want to to give us any more ammo. It's a calculated decision IMHO.
I used to live in LA. The LA Weekly is leftist fishwrap.
Actually, most fish is too good for the LA Weekly.
He's not gonna be happy since it turns out he was absolutely right; "Crash" did win Best Picture! Haw haw!
“Boy hidey, those show-biz folk are just a homo-promotin’, liberal-media-embracin’, minority-lovin’, devil-worshippin’, pimp-hustlin’, terrorist-protectin’..."
Still thinks being conservative means being a less likable version of the Beverly Hillbillies, I see...
I didn't watch the oscars and you can be sure I won't be watching Brokeback Humping Mountain either. BTW, I've never watched the oscars, emmy's or any other awards show.
Brokeback Cabaret?
This guy sounds like a clear case of brain-gone-to-crap.
A writer for a weekly no one will read, worrying that a movie no one bothered to see won't win an award on an awards show no one bothered to tune in to.
By posting the guy's article, here, someone besides his mom and his room mate read it, so I think we've done him a favor.
I've never seen a more apt description of Hollywood. In fact, it's so nice, I'm going to say it twice!
Hollywood is a group of devil-worshippin’, pimp-hustlin’, terrorist-protectin’ bunch of pansies, commies and traitors.
Does the author think a lot of us out here care. I for one have long given up on the movies and tv. It's amazing how one is ripped off with the non-talented stupidly written movies and programs that are played over and over and over and over again. The only ones that are gaining are the money grubbing even less talented crooks.
Just the other day I was saying "boy hidey," by far the most overused expression in my personal lexicon. Is there a day that goes by here on FR where we don't see "boy hideys" all over every thread?
These sharp Hollywood denizens sure have us pegged, don't they? It's embarrassing to be so deftly exposed.
Well he called it and it all about money.:)
You know what, Nikki? I have a difficult time taking a writer (or the semblance of a writer) seriously when they use slang-hand in their "work."
"Cantcha" see my point?
We all get the underLYING message about "red staters" when a writer pretends to talk for them and uses language like that. We're all dumb rednecks who don't know nuthin, duhhh.
grrrrrrrrrrr
The author probably left off a couple of important insults, but I'll take it. The "minority-lovin'" piece of it is just liberal racist crap, of course.
On the other hand, you’d think the religious right would be dropping to their knees and thanking the Lord, for instance, about the miracle of Munich and Spielberg squeezing out nominations.
Actually, personally, I don't much give a damn which crappy movies Hollywood chooses to congratulate itself over.
Hollywood has obviously decided that heterosexual, white males are not a good target demographic.
Apparently, HWM's who attend theaters are, more often than not, going to see movies which their wives/girlfriends prefer.
Therefore, movie producers are often targeting the Oprah crowd, who prefer neutered males and butchy women.
HWM's are reading books and perusing the internet, which is, I suppose, a hopeful development.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.