1 posted on
03/05/2006 3:19:01 PM PST by
neverdem
To: neverdem
--
But that might be wishful thinking. Congress, by nature, is an inefficient institution driven by self-interested politicians. Wasteful spending is par for the course. And if it is sad that lawmakers treat homeland security the same way they treat everything else, it certainly isnt surprising.----that about wraps it up---
2 posted on
03/05/2006 3:24:27 PM PST by
rellimpank
(Don't believe anything about firearms or explosives stated by the mass media---NRABenefactor)
To: neverdem
3 posted on
03/05/2006 3:24:44 PM PST by
Dallas59
((“You love life, while we love death"( Al-Qaeda & Democratic Party))
To: neverdem
Will read later.
However, it is our responsiblity as citizens to be prepared. We cannot assume the government is going to take care of us. For those who wish the government to be the answer to everything---you are an idiot!
To: neverdem
8 posted on
03/05/2006 3:32:51 PM PST by
Cboldt
To: neverdem
They forgot the most important reason for "How did this happen?": that Washington D.C. is a festering pit of influence peddling and corruption that would make Caligula blush.
12 posted on
03/05/2006 3:40:45 PM PST by
thoughtomator
(I understand Democrats' impatience; If Kerry were President, Iran would have nuked Israel by now)
To: neverdem
Congress is a miracle of nature--it turns beef into pork.
:-)
15 posted on
03/05/2006 3:47:19 PM PST by
cgbg
(Never Again? Hitliar is running for President.)
To: neverdem
TSA: Thugs Standing Around
Thousands Standing Around
Tough Sh*t, A$$h*le
Throw Shoes Away
Take Some Asprin
You get the gist..
19 posted on
03/05/2006 4:17:50 PM PST by
xcamel
(Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
To: neverdem
If I had $180 billion, and the political power to go with it, I'd use the money to kick the asses of Syria, Iran and North Korea. That would buy the U.S. more security than anything that could be done domestically.
23 posted on
03/05/2006 4:47:55 PM PST by
Mr Ramsbotham
(Bend over and think of England.)
To: neverdem
Stunning waste?
Stunning to whom?
Not to anyone over the age of 12 who has ever seen the government in action.
28 posted on
03/05/2006 4:58:42 PM PST by
Jim Noble
(And you know what I'm talkin' 'bout!)
To: neverdem
Homeland security funding is a mess. Here, Detroit gets mad because Lansing doesn't give them the money fast enough. Then the suburbs complain because most the population isn't actually in the city limits of Detroit so all the 'burbs want their cut for their projects cuz they aren't in *Detroit*. And then they talk about how much they want to *cooperate* with others in the region. And who knows what the money is really going for. Detroit isn't known for money management.
30 posted on
03/05/2006 5:12:15 PM PST by
kcbc2001
To: neverdem
If power companies invested in infrastructure the way DHS and Congress fight terrorism, a New Yorker wouldnt be able to run a hairdryer but everyone in Bozeman, Montana, could light up a stadium. Isn't this the case for most of government...
31 posted on
03/05/2006 6:01:40 PM PST by
Fruitbat
To: neverdem
$450 per household could put a .357 magnum revolver in every house in the nation.
Now that would do more to improve homeland security than anything else I could think of.
And in the meantime literally tens of thousands of people illegally enter our country every year without even the most cursory sort of background check.
Madness...
L
33 posted on
03/05/2006 8:28:58 PM PST by
Lurker
(Cuz I got one hand in my pocket and the other one is slapping a hippy.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson