This comment is beyond trivial.
All of those examples (ERVs, processed pseudogenes, Vit C) are found at the same position at analogous chromosomal loci between the species.
So why did I have to point it out to people who think they are at "the exact same site".
The chimp genome and other studies show that there are elements seen in various species that don't follow the phylogentic tree, such as those reported in the original chimp genome paper.
Hand waving about exact same site or exact same or apples and oranges doesn't make it go away.
Your problem is you think it somehow disproves evolution, which it doesn't