So why did I have to point it out to people who think they are at "the exact same site".
The chimp genome and other studies show that there are elements seen in various species that don't follow the phylogentic tree, such as those reported in the original chimp genome paper.
Hand waving about exact same site or exact same or apples and oranges doesn't make it go away.
Your problem is you think it somehow disproves evolution, which it doesn't
The sites are analogous of course. This goes without saying.
Your comment is like saying the 4rd edition of a book does not contain the same text as the 3rd because chapter 2 starts on a different page. Trivial to the point of absurdity.
You realize that the chromosomal number designations are a man made artificial construct? LOL.