[curiosity]

Okay, so find for me a biology text, published since 1999, that contains the fradulant drawings.

[Mamzelle]

re: find for me a biology text, published since 1999)))

Yeah, and I'm sure they've apologized for previous teachings.

The trouble with all these pseudo-sciences like cosmology, evo, archeology, anthropology--they are ultimately unaccountable. They are interesting, entertaining. But when a "better explanation" comes along to replace "previous better explanation"--the previous one need not issue any apology. It just fades away.

No deterrance in these fields of fancy.

[TASMANIANRED]

You and I are arguing cross purposes.

I am arguing from a position that text books are published from a liberal ,politically correct perspective.

They are loaded cover to cover with inaccuracies and deliberately so.

It is far worse in the area of history and social sciences but the bull has invaded science.

The fraudulent drawings have been used for the past 30 years to support the abortion myth of fetus as blob.. It is the political will of the left that this perception continue.

Any science book that is pushing the global warming myth is destined to have other pseudo sciences in it.

Just because a single group of authors issued a correction does not mean that other authors have corrected.

You can keep the chip on your shoulder.

It is your source cited and your place to prove otherwise.

You are extrapolating from a single example to a generality.