Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mongeaux
With that much headway a small electromagnetic field is unliely to stop them in the last second or so of the attack. But it's better than nothing.

Agreed. I'd rather be hit by a shark going 20 mph, than hit AND BIT by a shark going 20 mph.

YMMV...

14 posted on 03/05/2006 10:24:34 AM PST by null and void (I nominate Sept 11th: "National Moderate Muslim Day of Tacit Approval". - Mr. Rational, paraphrased)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: null and void

I wonder how an electromagnetic field is propagated in salt water. Radar waves are quickly attenuated, that is why we use SONAR.


16 posted on 03/05/2006 10:33:39 AM PST by Citizen Tom Paine (An old sailor sends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
Agreed. I'd rather be hit by a shark going 20 mph, than hit AND BIT by a shark going 20 mph.

It's not foolproof - you could be hit and bit, albeit with less accuracy. The electromagnetic sense provided by the Ampullae of Lorenzini (oil filled pores on the snout) appear to be used to guide the shark to its prey in the last few moments of the bite. A nictating membrane rolls up over the sharks' eyes to protect them, rendering the fish essentially blind at the moment of the bite. However, your chance of surviving the attack are still better with a shark pod than without.
17 posted on 03/05/2006 10:37:41 AM PST by Mongeaux (''I would sooner be governed by the first 2,000 names in the Boston phone directory," W.F. Buckley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson