The end of neo-conservative denial, innocence and naivete for one.
Explain please. And anyway, what the heck is a "neo-con"?
How can a soldier possibly killing another out of jealousy, have implications for the broader war? I do not understand your mentality.
What the hell are you talking about?
handbasket, hell. It's a grenade.
"The end of neo-conservative denial, innocence and naivete for one."
Stories like this are a regular roach motel for trolls like you and some of the others who jumped on a headline to spread outrageous lies.
Behold the story:
Investigation Launched Into Tillman's Death
By Josh White
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, March 4, 2006; 6:03 PM
The Army is opening a criminal investigation into the friendly fire death of former NFL player Pat Tillman to probe whether negligent homicide charges should be brought against members of his Ranger unit who killed him in Afghanistan nearly two years ago, according to defense officials.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/04/AR2006030400824.html
"The end of neo-conservative denial, innocence and naivete for one."
Please explain.
Good grief.
Look, folks... We've known from just about the day after he was killed that it was most probably friendly fire. Regrettable, of course. Heartbreaking, naturally. But it does happen and at some level is practically inevitable.
Negligence? Well... of course... if somebody is killed accidently it means that somebody was probably not paying attention to the right thing at the right time. This *too* is inevitable.
Intentional... would be another matter altogether, and if there is evidence that causes re-opening of the case, so be it.
But beyond that, there is no political angle to the story.
You disgust me. I hope they zot your a$$ back to DU where you belong.
Enough, adios.