Posted on 03/04/2006 1:15:22 PM PST by Glenn
Edited on 03/04/2006 1:43:51 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
No, if true, he should be hung on a gallows at Leavenworth. But I doubt if either will happen. pretty bad though that so many are already convinced this was a homicide and not an accidental death by friendly fire.
I have been under friendly fire from artillery, mortars, small arms and helicopter gunships. During combat things like that can happen and has happened in almost every war we have fought as a nation.
I am all for the criminal investigation so that this can be cleared up and people can get the truth one way or the other.
I hate to break it to you, but I've lost friends and family members. Not this war, unless you count the dozen friends (including a roommate) I lost on 9/11 when the Towers came down. So I'm familiar with causalties. I'm familiar with the tragedy.
I don't think you're really reading my posts. Surely you have to recognize that the loss of a high-profile solider in combat is bad PR for the Army, and bad PR for the WOT as a whole.
Like it or not, PR is part of the game. The Administration has to keep selling this war, and rehashing the loss of soldiers like Pat Tillman makes that harder, which is why the DOD must have a very good reason for doing so.
We delivered double c-rats to ROK units in the field.
I liked working with the Tiger Division troops, very tough guys.
Very tough. Once, while the huey was about to touch down on the re-supply pad, a ROK NCO flew off the aircraft before the skids touched the ground. He dove headfirst into an underling who he decided was not approaching the chopper fast enough to off load supplies. The next time we came in the poor guy moved a little faster. He was also sporting a patched up head wound the sergeant had inflicted on him.
Furthermore, I find offensive the amount of our tax money approved for the wealthy survivors of 9/11 as compared to the survivors of our soldiers killed in action.
No such idea but to encourage more millionaires to serve their country.
I'm not buyin.
The investigation is for NEGLIGENCE, not homicide. Investigating a friendly fire death for negligence is absolutely reprehensible.
This is the 4th investigation I believe I've read. This is the Pentagon cowtowing to the parents of Tillman. Repugnant.
No such idea but to encouage more millionaires to serve their country.
________
Rotsa ruck with that one.
Enough, adios.
GIs die...One thing is certain when they do.... there dead, thats what happens when you mix guns, tanks, planes, helicopters, artillery, mines, mortars, nachineguns boobytraps and humans and all manner of places and conditions.
Tilman family and friends.
Being a GI is not like being a Peace Officer, a Football Player or a Movie Star so show some respect and Shutup!!.... he is dead...it doesn't matter how, he showed up took his chances like all the rest and deserves the same respect... nothing less, nothing more. I read your sorry selves better than you do. You want Tillman and or his death to somehow be special.. He is not nor was his death. I cannot stand your implications that one of the guys who nobody knows suffocating under an overturned APC in Yakima or with his guts blown out in Korea is less meaningful that Tillman. Quite frankly if he were anything close to kind of solder you would have us believe he was (and I am not saying he was not) he would be ashamed of all of you and your endless searching for ... What?
A higher meaning?
Whatever the heck that means...
Let it go...
W
Having a bunch of legal scum and whiners trying to hang his death on some other equally scared, tired and confused GI is pure unadulterated garbage.
*snip*
The investigation process will not necessarily result in any charges against U.S. soldiers.
Two very important bits. Guilty men are the ones who are worried about their alibis. These soldiers didn't feel they needed one because they weren't hiding anything. As for whyt he family wasn't told immediately, I'd like to think it's because the Army was hoping to make Tillman into an even greater hero somehow. I don't know. In any case, he WAS a hero and I am grateful to and for him.
I could be wrong, but I believe this investigation is more about what went on after he was killed. More like putting some light on any CYA actions by those in charge. If this is what is really happening, I think it a good thing.
When you say, "the Army" it means someone, probably at a high level (four-star or civilian appointee), had to make a decision to go that route. If the investigation reveals something like that, it could be very ugly.
You remind me of the story of General Patton receving a speeding ticket during the Louisian Maneuvers. Patton refused the ticket until the commanding officer of the Maneuvers forced him to accept the ticket.
You must be unfamiliar with ROTC guys getting shot in the back in Vietnam as well? Take off the rose colored.
classy.
You sure seemed to have a problem with Tillman. Every child is special to his/her family. And yes, normal people usually do want to know how a close member of their family died. Your attacks on the family are arrogant, cruel, and phony.
Didn't it used to be military policy until somewhat recently that close relatives couldn't serve in the same unit?
If so, I don't think they should have changed that policy.
"What is it with the military persecuting their own troops?"
Oh, I'm sure I'll be pilloried for this, but the problem is women in uniform. It is their presence that creates the culture that leads to this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.